The information may not be reliable. It has many different articles on their site. If an article submitted does contain the proper facts information could be unreliable.
Information that you can trust would be termed reliable. If you aren't sure of the source, or the source is someone that you don't trust, then the information would be unreliable, and you wouldn't count on it in an important situation. If the information is reliable, then you might trust it without doing your own research.
unreliable sources show nothing close to many reliable sources
UNRELIABLE
The opposite is "unreliable."
No TCP a reliable protocol whereas UDP is unreliable.
Your doctor
An example: Let's say you had a bad disease that was curable only if treated in the first week. Now let's say you had unreliable information, say, your doctor said you were fine. So in seven days you pass from curable to incurable. Understand?
An example: Let's say you had a bad disease that was curable only if treated in the first week. Now let's say you had unreliable information, say, your doctor said you were fine. So in seven days you pass from curable to incurable. Understand?
One can find reliable information about Steve Jobs' betrayal from reliable sources such as Time Magazine. An unreliable place to get this type of information would be some social media sites which often just pass gossip along.
No it is very unreliable.
An example: Let's say you had a bad disease that was curable only if treated in the first week. Now let's say you had unreliable information, say, your doctor said you were fine. So in seven days you pass from curable to incurable. Understand?