In the context of relationships between health care providers and patients, this is simply "doing no harm". The golden rules of medicine are "first do no harm, then do good wherever possible". Non-maleficence changes depending on the situation. Consider a patient with terminal cancer... while it would be beneficial to prescribe analgesia to ease their pain, non-malefience might suggest we should not prescribe too much pain killer in order to avoid overdose or interaction with other drugs. It's a pretty weak example but the four pillars of ethics (these two and "autonomy" and "justice") must be closely examined in clinical decision making, assuming you're asking about a medical context.
There is no such a principle as non- beneficence. There are two main ethical principles of beneficence (do good) and non- maleficence (do no harm or in Latin, Primum non nocere)
There is no such a principle as non- beneficence. There are two main ethical principles of beneficence (do good) and non- maleficence (do no harm or in Latin, Primum non nocere)
It seems you didn't specify the list of options to choose from regarding the four principles. Generally, in various contexts, the four principles often refer to ethical frameworks like autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice in healthcare. If you provide the specific options, I can help identify which one is not part of the four principles.
Non-maleficence in human services refers to the ethical principle of "doing no harm." An example is a social worker who assesses a child's living situation. If the assessment reveals potential abuse, the worker must take appropriate action to protect the child, even if it may disrupt the family dynamic. By prioritizing the child's safety and well-being, the social worker upholds the principle of non-maleficence in their practice.
to do no harm or avoiding harm
It is pronounced as "non-muh-LEF-uh-sens."
Medical ethics often involves balancing patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. Ethical dilemmas arise when these principles conflict, such as when a patient's wishes may not align with what is medically best for them. Striking an ethical balance requires careful consideration of individual circumstances, cultural values, and the potential impacts on both the patient and society. Ultimately, ethical decision-making in medicine seeks to promote well-being while respecting individual rights.
The four principles of bioethics are autonomy (respect for individual's rights to make informed decisions), beneficence (duty to promote the well-being of patients), non-maleficence (do no harm), and justice (fair and equal distribution of healthcare resources).
I strive to provide a standard of care that is non-maleficence.
The four basic principles used to judge the ethics of research are respect for persons, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. Respect for persons emphasizes informed consent and autonomy of participants. Beneficence requires researchers to maximize benefits while minimizing potential harm, while non-maleficence focuses specifically on avoiding harm. Justice involves ensuring fair distribution of the research benefits and burdens among different groups in society.
Vegans are guided by ethical considerations such as compassion for animals, environmental sustainability, and health. They follow principles of non-harm, justice, and respect for all living beings.
Principles for the grater good.