In the context of relationships between health care providers and patients, this is simply "doing no harm". The golden rules of medicine are "first do no harm, then do good wherever possible". Non-maleficence changes depending on the situation. Consider a patient with terminal cancer... while it would be beneficial to prescribe analgesia to ease their pain, non-malefience might suggest we should not prescribe too much pain killer in order to avoid overdose or interaction with other drugs. It's a pretty weak example but the four pillars of ethics (these two and "autonomy" and "justice") must be closely examined in clinical decision making, assuming you're asking about a medical context.
There is no such a principle as non- beneficence. There are two main ethical principles of beneficence (do good) and non- maleficence (do no harm or in Latin, Primum non nocere)
There is no such a principle as non- beneficence. There are two main ethical principles of beneficence (do good) and non- maleficence (do no harm or in Latin, Primum non nocere)
to do no harm or avoiding harm
It is pronounced as "non-muh-LEF-uh-sens."
The four principles of bioethics are autonomy (respect for individual's rights to make informed decisions), beneficence (duty to promote the well-being of patients), non-maleficence (do no harm), and justice (fair and equal distribution of healthcare resources).
I strive to provide a standard of care that is non-maleficence.
Principles for the grater good.
there are no objective ethical facts and no true ethical principles
Ethical principles guide individuals to make decisions that are morally right and just.
muchas cosas
what are the ethical principles
The prefix of "ethical" is "eth-" which means relating to moral principles or the study of morality.