NO, it is not unless it is not given to the area surrounding uterus, in pregnant ladies, to the metastatic lesions and to severely osteoporotic bones.
as this neglegance can be harmful and affect in utero chlid growth, can enhance metastaic process and destroy osteoporotic bones.
yes
the penetration of SWD is deeper than MWD MWD is easier than SWD (ease of application) MWD treats 1 aspect of the body but SWD treats 2 aspects also there are diffrences in wavelength and frequency and other differences may be !
William Beaumont has written: 'Diathermy, short wave therapy, inductothermy, epithermy' -- subject(s): Electrotherapeutics
Because Some Pationist thougt it is useless Tretement due to un feeling Effective'
Shortwave diathermy is commonly used in physical therapy for conditions such as muscle strains, joint stiffness, and arthritis. It provides deep tissue heating which can help with pain relief and improving blood circulation to promote healing.
A short wave of radiation refers to electromagnetic waves with high frequency and short wavelengths, such as ultraviolet (UV) and X-rays. These waves carry high energy and can have both beneficial and harmful effects on living organisms depending on the dose and exposure.
No, it isn't harmful at its standard characteristics of operation.
Short Wave Live was created in 1993.
Yes and no. They create UV rays, which can cause cancer, but its debatable if black lights are that powerful. Black light, or near-ultraviolet light, is not harmful at a distance. Some sources might have enough short-wave UV to be harmful at short distances over a long period.
beaches only can be harmful to communities when there is a a really big wave.
An electromagnetic or a radio wave withwavelengthless then 100 meters called as Short Wave.
Short Wave on a Cold Day was created in 2001.