Iridology, the practice of examining the iris to diagnose health issues, is widely regarded as quackery by the medical community. Scientific studies have not provided substantial evidence supporting its efficacy, and it lacks a biological basis. While some practitioners claim it can reveal information about a person's health, most health professionals advocate for conventional diagnostic methods that are proven to be effective. Overall, reliance on iridology can lead to misinformation and delayed medical treatment.
Quackery can have negative psychological effects such as promoting false hope, creating distrust in legitimate medical professionals, and causing anxiety when individuals believe in ineffective treatments. Falling victim to quackery can also lead to a sense of betrayal and disappointment when promised cures or treatments do not work as claimed.
Iridology readings are performed by naturopaths, chiropractors, nutritionists, iridologists.
No special preparations are necessary before an iridology reading.
Iridology is also called iris analysis or iris diagnosis.
Device Quackery
Quackery is the thing of detecting improper medical practices. Quackery is something that should not be increased.
effects of medical quackery
effects of medical quackery
An iridology reading is unlikely to cause physical harm by itself. Critics of iridology say that readings that suggest a condition that does not exist or missing a condition that does exist could be unhealthy.
The plural form of the noun 'quackery' is quackeries.
Tagalog translation of QUACKERY: satsatTagalog translation of QUACKERY: satsat
Iridology began with a book called Chiromatica medica by Philippus Meyers, 1670. The father of iridology is Dr. Ignatz von Peczely, 1881. And Swedish homeopath Nils Liljequist, 1800's.