Arguing is part of the human condition. Some individuals seem to get into many arguments while others seem to avoid them.
its solely dependent upon parents and children and there thinking...if they never listened to you in past..you are definitely going to have arguments in future as you will always think that you don't get importance in family..but if they have always listened to you..then its a chance you may have less arguments..but as teenagers, we often have arguments with parents, because we are constantly changing our views (but our parents aren't), so of course this leads to arguments.
They are meeting public demands.
Flaws in the majority opinion
Prevailing arguments refer to viewpoints or opinions that are currently the most widely accepted or dominant within a particular context or field of discussion. These arguments are often supported by evidence and have gained widespread acceptance among experts or the general public.
Formal arguments are the named arguments defined by the function. Actual arguments are those arguments that were passed to the function by the caller.
The design argument, often associated with William Paley, posits that the complexity and order found in the universe suggest the existence of an intelligent designer, much like a watch implies a watchmaker. Causation arguments, particularly in the context of cosmological arguments, assert that everything that exists must have a cause, leading to the conclusion that there must be an uncaused cause, often identified as God. Together, these arguments aim to demonstrate the existence of a higher power through the observation of design and the necessity of causation in the universe.
Arguments using numbers to prove their point.
Flaws in the majority opinion
common form of moral arguments
A speaker addresses arguments and counterarguments by providing his or her own arguments. The speaker will have to provide evidence that supports his or her own arguments.
He had a fiery temper that often led to arguments with his coworkers.
Arguments in support of torture often center on the belief that it can be an effective means of obtaining critical information, particularly in situations involving imminent threats, such as terrorism. Proponents may argue that in extreme scenarios, the potential to save lives justifies the use of torture. Additionally, some contend that it can serve as a deterrent against future crimes. However, these arguments are highly controversial and often criticized for ethical, legal, and practical reasons.