0
How many years did the colonists have to take care of the British soldiers?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
over 9000
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who forced their colonist to let the soldiers go in their house?
British Soldiers seeking refuge during the war would barge into colonists' homes and demand the colonists inside the home to take care of them.
The Third Amendement Gives Freedom From The Need To?
Quartering of soldiers. In the time before the American Revolution, some soldiers of the army for the british would live with the colonists. Most colonists would not like having to supply food and care for the soldiers. However, the colonist were not able to deny the quartering because of the british law. The 3rd amendment makes it unconstitutional for the government to force people to let soldiers live with them.
Why did the british win the war against the boers?
Because there were more British soldiers than Voortrekkers and they were not soldiers, they also had families to care for.
Quatering act of 1765?
The Quartering Act were two acts that were put in place by the British Parliament in 1765. The purpose of these acts were to require the governments of the American to provide British soldiers with requests for lodging and food.
Was the quartering act repealed?
The quartering act is the act that allowed the British soldiers to be quartered, or housed, in the colonist's homes. The colonists also had to feed, give them clothes, and take care of them until they felt that they didn't want or need to stay there anymore.
Why were the colonists proud of their actions at the Battle of Bunker Hill?
They killed a lot of the British people, but they lost the hill, but the colonists didn't care, because they killed A LOT of British people. It was saying that the colonists were tough and weren't going to take what the British were dishing out. They also were not sure if they could win the war and this convinced them they could.
What were colonists who chose to side with the British known as?
Loyalists
Why did the colonists view these laws as attacks on their rights as British citizens?
The colonists felt that the tax laws should be passed only by their colonial representation. "No taxation without representation" became a rallying cry of the colonists.
Why were the colonists and the British unable to compromise and settle their differences?
The british wanted to control everything. They didn't care what the colonists wanted. The colonists on The other hand decided "hey we had this land first, why not make it our own?" This angered the british and caused a war. The countries no longer liked eachother(:
What are some examples of the british harsh trade and tax policies against the colonists?
some was taxes and i really don't care nobody should care that stuff is like 100 years old like come on we don't got time to find it ......... YEA AAH I SAID
Why were colonist unhappy with British?
OMG! WE LEARNED THIS IN HISTORY LAST WEEK! YAY IM HELPFULL! ok the colonists felt that since they couldnt elect anyone to parliment, that they shouldnt be taxed by them. but the british didnt care what the colonists thought, they tried raising the taxes in britian but that caused riots there so they felt safe taxing the colonists. but the colonists scared away the tax collectors so the king made an examlpe of Boston and sent a bunch of soldiers there and made a law saying that they could tax the colonists and that the colonies existed only to serve britain. this angered the colonists and that lead to the american revolution. all in all, they thought it was violating thier freedome rights =P
Why were colonist proud of their actions at the battle of Bunker Hill?
They killed a lot of the British people, but they lost the hill, but the colonists didn't care, because they killed A LOT of British people. It was saying that the colonists were tough and weren't going to take what the British were dishing out. They also were not sure if they could win the war and this convinced them they could.
