The alveolar macrophage is important in the defense of the lung and may be the pathogenesis of lung disease. Cell counts in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid have lead to the conclusion that smokers have an increased number of alveolar macrophages but have not enabled the number to be related to a measure of lung structure. The alveolar macrophage is important in the defense of the lung and may be the pathogenesis of lung disease. Cell counts in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid have lead to the conclusion that smokers have an increased number of alveolar macrophages but have not enabled the number to be related to a measure of lung structure.
It depends on what considers a smoker. Do they smoke daily, once a week, once a month? How long have they been smoking for? As for the nonsmoker, are they healthy? Are they fit? A person who smokes once a week and works out may be more fit than someone who is ill and sedentary. However, on average, if you were to take two keep in exact same conditions, the smoker would definitely be losing capacity in the lungs. The person with the most lung capacity would be a fit healthy nonsmoker. Cardio activity such as running, increases lung capacity.
It's impossible to say. Smoking is one of MANY things which can affect the alveoli. The lungs of a smoker and a non-smoker are difficult to tell apart. On the other hand, a diseased lung looks very different to an undiseased one. If you are are shown a photo of a 'smoker's lung', it's most probably the diseased lung of a pig.
Smoker: person who smokes cigars, cigarettes, ect. and may develop lung cancer. Smokers usually have bad breath, yellow teeth, a hard time breathing, lung problems, and other unhealthy symptoms. Nonsmoker: Person who doesn't smoke but may be a second hand smoker. A second hand smoker has been with a smoker almost all their life.
As a smoker, I can say that no, you can't take more air into the lungs than a non-smoker. Since I started smoking, like, 10 years ago, my lung capacity became ruined. Basically, I get tired really quickly, and running for example is out of question. So no, if anything, smoker can take less air than non-smoker. Also, lungs become "clogged" with dust, tar particles and won't "isolate" oxygen from air.
For lung cancer, the symptoms are very hard to detect. If you are a smoker, you might feel them in an advance manner than a non-smoker. This includes very rapid weight gain and loss, loss being the most advanced symptom in accordance with lung cancer.
Not sucking on a roll of paper full of ash that can cause Lung Cancer or even kill you.
Because non smoker's have WAYYY better health then a smoker in racing.
There could be several prefixes for smoker: ex-, anti-, and non-.
Yes in someway. See, a healthy non smoker has a lung capacity of a 100%. Smokers have can inhale about 80%. When you excersice you will be able to inhale less oxygen and therefore be exhausted faster or for example lift less weight then you used to.
Second-hand smoke can cause scaring of the lungs.
Non Smoker
Typically, a smoker can hold their breath for the same amount of time as a non-smoker, which is around 30 seconds to 1 minute. However, smoking can impair lung function over time, affecting the ability to hold breath for longer durations.
The main reason why smoking should be banned in public places is because the smoke affects non-smokers as well. Smoke produced from the cigarette or tobacco results in lung cancer for anyone who inhales it, both the smoker and non-smoker.