Well, by slums I assume you mean Indian slums commonly seen in those adverts made to tug at your heart strings.
First of all, you have to understand the different groups of people who may come into contact with the slums.
The first being residents. Residents there may treat each other relatively fine, unless divided by political, religious or Gang violence. So it differs depending on the circumstance.
The second group of people would be middle class people. I'm sure they'd avoid the slums if possible, but if they did have to go into the slums for some unknown reason, I doubt they'd look too favourable on the conditions and people. But again, it depends entirely on how liberal the individuals is and their understanding to the situation of people living in slums.
poor people are treated badly do not get proper opportunities.
Slums were made as living situations for people who did not have a lot of money. These slums are not well kept because the people do not have the money to keep it up.
There are a lot of slums in Washington D.C. slums are people who live in cardboard boxes or under highways
Many people are homeless or live in the slums in the Philippines. It is estimated that 40% or over 32 million people are either home or live in the slums.
40.4
many slums are dirty and inhabited by poor people that cant afford or are forced by social divisisons
The biggest slum in mumbai is Dharavi. Its population is between 600, 000.
69
From the 2009 census, about 170,000 people.
The causes of slums in Egypt is really quite sad. These people suffer from poverty, drugs, and unstable work environments.
Yes, they have.
A common belief was that people who lived in the slums were lazy or unmotivated, when in fact they often faced systemic barriers such as lack of education, job opportunities, and affordable housing. These stereotypes overlooked the structural issues that perpetuated poverty and inequality in the slums.