0
I do agree with the statement which says a human being can not live without communication because everything do communicate,For example,you torch a stone, that stone do communicate with you through texture, and even mass.Animals also communicate with people, such as dogs.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
when do you choose agree highly agree disagree highly disagree and neutral?
There are many times where you may highly agree or disagree on a subject. If you are talking with someone about a topic, you may choose to stay neutral, or agree or disagree with what is being said.
Do you agree or disagree cite evidence to back up opinion?
I agree with many things and I disagree with many things. You'd have to let me know what is being proposed.
How can frustrations be avoided when considering teamwork?
Communication, loads of it. Keep up to date on projects otherwise agree to disagree either way you gotta get it done and being frustrated about it isn't going to get you anywhere
Should you break up with your boyfriend of 2 years because of religion?
If religion is a big enough issue to seriously get between you without being able to "agree to disagree", then yes. You're looking at a lifetime of strife (again, unless you can agree to disagree) and it will only get worse if there are strong feelings about how to raise children regarding religion.
Do you agree or disagree that people who do not do well on traditional intelligence tests possibly being intelligent in other areas?
Different people will have different opinions. Personally, I agree with that statement.
Generally people feel that being nice to other people is a sign of weakness. Agree Disagree?
Being nice to someone should not be a sign of weakness.
Do all parents agree or disagree on the issue of their teens being in a courtship relation?
Teenagers date. Parents opinions differ. As always.
Communication axpexts argue that there is no way that a human being cannot communicate.Do you agree or disagree?
Conventionally, human communication happens in either a vocal or bodily way, with a properly functioning mind (or relevant portions thereof) serving as a root-cause in each case. Thus, the loss of one's vocal or bodily means of communicating would cause one to be human without being able to communicate while, more drastically, the loss of one's mind-functioning (or relevant portions thereof) would do the same.
No one can be agnostic do you agree?
I disagree, being an agnostic myself. I would be interested to hear why you think that nobody can be an agnostic, since you obviously did when you posted this question.
Ineffective communication is the fault of the sender do you agree or disagree discuss?
The question cannot be one of yes or no. Both sender and receiver are critical to the effectiveness of good communication. As a sender, communication must be based on: * Knowing your subject thoroughly * The sender must take ownership and responsibility of what is being said * Respecting the listener * Making ideas clear and concise * Showing concern for the listener * Asking for feedback from the listener As a listener, good communication cannot be complete without: * Preparation and willingness to listen * Encouraging the sender to say more (show interest, verbal and nonverbal) * Assimilating the information, and reflecting on it before giving a response * Showing respect for the sender * Being open minded * Clarifying information received, by repeating back and paraphrasing information received Without the above ingredients , both sender and listener can be at fault of ineffective communication.
Can an individual enter into a contract without being aware of it and be bound by its terms?
If they didn't sign the contract or agree to it, then obviously no. But if they did sign or agree to it, without reading the fine print, then yes.
Do you agree or disagree with the professor explain?
In order to know if one agrees or disagrees with the professor one needs to know more information such as the topic being discussed and the professors point of view.
