Both of the above
According to Achebe, Conrad's issue or problem with the firefighter is that he is not "in his place."
in their place
Achebe suggested that Conrad only saw the setting of Africa in its two extremes, silence and frenzy.
In Achebe's critique of Conrad's novel "Heart of Darkness," he argues that Conrad's problem with the character of the African fireman is rooted in his portrayal as a dehumanized and simplistic figure, reinforcing colonial stereotypes and perpetuating the narrative of African inferiority. Achebe suggests that this portrayal reflects Conrad's own biases and limitations as a product of his time and context.
That Africa is the "antithesis" of Europe
In Achebe's critique of Conrad's "Heart of Darkness," he argues that Conrad portrays Africa and its people as a backdrop to explore the existential question of human existence. Achebe criticizes this as dehumanizing and perpetuating harmful stereotypes about Africa and its inhabitants. By prioritizing the existential concerns of the European characters over the humanity of the African characters, Conrad's narrative reinforces colonialist attitudes.
The point is that the rivers have a "lurking kinship."
Achebe points to Conrad's use of language and narrative perspective to suggest that Conrad approves of Marlow. Achebe argues that the way Conrad elevates Marlow's character and viewpoint, along with the lack of substantial critique of Marlow's actions, implies a form of endorsement by the author.
Achebe points to the similarities between their two careers in order to suggest that Conrad approves of Marlow.
That he is a racist.
At the end of the story, Achebe concludes that Conrad's novel "Heart of Darkness" perpetuates harmful stereotypes about Africa and its people. Achebe criticizes Conrad's portrayal of Africans as savages and argues that the novel reflects colonialist attitudes and prejudices.
To have them convince the reader of their savagery through their own words