0
In science and physics, if new, legitimate evidence surfaces that doesn't agree with our current theories, then either the theory must be severely modified or it must be scrapped entirely.
A good example would be with Isaac newton and Albert Einstein. Newton discovered gravity and invented the math that we still use today for everyday tasks. But Newton was actually wrong. Einstein showed us the new picture of gravity, which isn't a force at all but rather a shape of space and time, and we just move along the curves of the fabric of what Einstein called spacetime.
The only reason we didn't scrap Newton's equations though is because the difference between the two theories only becomes really noticeable when you're moving close to the speed of light or around a massive object like a sun, galaxy or black hole. So for every day experience the change is so small we can't notice the difference except with extremely sensitive equipment.
What else can I help you with?
What Scientific is the term used for a scientific theory that is generally accepted by an overwhelming number of scientists?
that research and observations support the theorythat research and observations support the theory is the correct answer
Do you think it's wise for scientists not to accept a theory immediately even if the theory has a lot of evidence to support it?
Each scientists have there own opinion. Some accept theories and some have to have facts.
What might cause scientists to change scientific theory?
Because technology might change in the future.
A hypothesis that has been verified by many scientists?
scientific theory
Why was wegener's theory not accepted by all scientists?
Wegner's theory was not accept because he didn't have much evidence to support his theory with and scientists thought that there might have been a land bridge between the continents. Another reason to why his theory was rejected was that he was a foreigner, by that; the scientists didn't really take him seriously.
If new evidence does not support a scientific theory scientists will most likely?
if new evidence doesn't support a scientific theory, scientists will either revise the theory to accommodate the new evidence or discard the theory altogether in favor of a more accurate explanation. This process is crucial for the progress of science as it ensures that theories are continuously tested and refined to reflect our understanding of the natural world.
What is evidence in support of a scientific theory?
Evidence in support of a scientific theory includes experimental results, observational data, and mathematical models that consistently explain and predict phenomena. Peer-reviewed research papers, replication of results by other scientists, and the ability of the theory to make accurate predictions are all forms of evidence that strengthen a scientific theory.
What do scientists do when the evidence from experiments does not support a scientific theory?
They do the experiment again, double check all their calculations, then they come up with a new theory if it's necessary. That's why there's no such thing as a scientific fact, only scientific theories.
Does alcoholism skip generations?
No. There is no scientific evidence to support this theory.
Why Scientists are most likely to change a scientific theory if?
Scientists are most likely to change a scientific theory if new evidence contradicts the existing theory, if the theory fails to explain new observations accurately, or if a more comprehensive theory emerges that better explains the phenomena in question. Scientific theories are constantly refined and updated based on rigorous testing and evidence.
A physical representation of an atom is an example of a scientific?
If new evidence does not support a scientific theory, scientists will most likely
Which if these is not a kind of evidence used to support evolutionary theory?
Personal beliefs and opinions are not a kind of evidence used to support evolutionary theory. Scientific evidence such as fossil records, DNA analysis, and observational data are the main sources of evidence.
What Scientific is the term used for a scientific theory that is generally accepted by an overwhelming number of scientists?
that research and observations support the theorythat research and observations support the theory is the correct answer
What do you think scientists would do if they found evidence that did not support the Big Bang theory?
Discard it all.
How long was it before new evidence emerged to support wegener's original theory?
It took several decades before new evidence emerged to support Wegener's original theory of continental drift. In the 1960s, significant discoveries such as seafloor spreading and plate tectonics provided strong evidence to confirm Wegener's ideas. This eventually led to the widespread acceptance of the theory of plate tectonics in the scientific community.
Why do people preach evolution when it is just a theory?
Because non-scientists do not understand what a scientific theory actually means. It is not a random guess. Scientific theories are formed based on evidence and experimentation.The scientific community advocates evolution because all the evidence of life on our planet supports the theory.
What two things are required to support a scientific theory?
To support a scientific theory, two things are required: empirical evidence that can be observed and measured, and the ability to make accurate predictions based on the theory's principles.
