Science does not in itself have a negative effect on agriculture or on anything. Science is knowledge, which can be used wisely or foolishly. People who use scientific techniques in the pursuit of short-term agricultural productivity, without considering long-term results, will have problems in the long term. That is not the result of science, it is the result of short-sightedness.
There is no negative impact of science in life. It actually depends on how you use it.
Science is a bane because it is sometimes misused and that misuse often has negative effects on health and the environment.
Agriculture doesn't necessarily have any great importance to science, but science offers great benefits within agriculture.
Science is like a tool and if the people using it have negative intentions, then it may yield negative results. Weapons of mass destruction are made possible because of advancements in science and technology. Also, one unintentional effect of the advancement of science and technology is global warming.
The science of growing crops is agriculture; I wouldn't call it an art.
soil depletion
There is no negative impact of science in life. It actually depends on how you use it.
some of the possible negative effects of drought and extreme heat is that it will lead do poor production in terms of agriculture.
The primary negative effects of the Columbian Exchange were death, disease, and slavery. Positive effects included the incorporation of European methods of agriculture, and the introduction to the Americas of animals such as horses.
I can't see how agriculture in and of itself has negative effects, seeing as having food to eat is a great thing. However there are some practices employed by large farms that do have negative consequences. I'm not sure what scope you're talking about here since negative effects is vague but chemical runoff is one of the largest problems which I am away of. This is especially a problem when chemicals are over applied or not applied according to instructions.
Science is a bane because it is sometimes misused and that misuse often has negative effects on health and the environment.
Agriculture doesn't necessarily have any great importance to science, but science offers great benefits within agriculture.
Science is like a tool and if the people using it have negative intentions, then it may yield negative results. Weapons of mass destruction are made possible because of advancements in science and technology. Also, one unintentional effect of the advancement of science and technology is global warming.
Negative effects of the Neolithic revolution include increased susceptibility to disease due to denser populations living in close proximity, social inequality arising from the development of agriculture, and the environmental impact of deforestation and overexploitation of resources.
agriculture
For the science report, Jane researched the negative effects growth hormones have on livestock.
The science of growing crops is agriculture; I wouldn't call it an art.