NO scientific intervention is not necessary..to dig out mysteries i think its the job of historians not scientist and secondly how can we believe them how can we believe that the given information is true or not scientist should rather balance our future than past we are going to face many problems in future and scientist should devote their time solving that rather than digging out mysteries let the historians do their job, they know better. and if we take it in an irrational way their might be some curse or something which we are not aware of in some historic things so its better to not intervene in nature .mysteries were meant to be buried if people in the past wanted to keep everything open they would not have buried mysteries . There is a reason behind everything.. so did the people (of past ) had that is why they buried it.
Scientists that unearth and interpret objects from past societies are called archaeologists.
Science is a body of knowledge and it is the process to unearth new knowledge example to discover invent explore new things
Learn, determine, notice, realise, see, ascertain, discern, find, uncover, unearth, locate, detect, encounter
To be honest, they aren't. It just saves a whole lot of digging.They help because they save time and effort.A sonograph can reach to depths of a few km and only takes a couple of seconds to perform and minutes to analyse. While they cannot tell you exactly what's down there, they will give you and idea on the density (and therefore composition) and shape of any objects to be found.Imagine that you are looking for a metal object that has been buried to an unknown (but limited) depth in your back yard (alone):Sonographic readings will take - maybe a day - whereas without that (or other similar) technology and not knowing the depth, the best approaches are to either:pick a spot and dig until you hit the limit then try another - ordig the whole back yard up, say 1' at a time until you hit it.Even if you chose the first method and got it right the first time, it is a lot more work to dig a 3' hole than it is to stick a spike in the ground, press a button and then look at a computer screen for ten minutes (while drinking coffee).With the sonograph you can take readings from the whole yard in a few minutes and combine them to give you a picture of what's underneath. You'll still have to do some digging, but with the knowledge that you're digging in the right place and to the right depth (95% of the time - things do go wrong).Basically it takes the "hit and hope" aspect out of it
Sue Hendrickson used her observational skills, attention to detail, and knowledge of paleontology when she discovered Sue, the most complete Tyrannosaurus rex skeleton ever found. Her ability to recognize the significance of fossilized remains and her experience in excavation techniques allowed her to carefully unearth and document the find. Additionally, her perseverance and problem-solving skills were crucial in navigating the challenges of the excavation process.
Yes, scientific intervention is often crucial in unearthing buried mysteries, especially when it involves the use of technology, specialized tools, and analytical methods to uncover and understand hidden information. It allows for a systematic and evidence-based approach to solving complex puzzles and mysteries that may otherwise remain unsolved.
Unearth was created in 1998.
To unearth - means to uncover or discover. A treasure hunter might unearth a hidden artefact. Or a genealogist might unearth an unknown ancestor from historical records.
The past participle is unearthed.
Eastern Mass.
A sentence: " After digging, I could unearth the tree"
Resurrection - 2014 Unearth 1-2 was released on: USA: 16 March 2014
Resurrection - 2014 Unearth 1-2 is rated/received certificates of: USA:TV-14
Excavation is the term used in archeology to describe the process of systematically digging up and uncovering archaeological sites to unearth artifacts and other important findings.
no da dummass
exhume
dirt and rocks and maby mud