Yes, but ideally a single hypothesis for one set of tests is one sentence long.
If, say, you measure the viscosity of different types of ketchups and the texture of different types of ketchup, then there should be two "if... then... because" hypotheses because hypotheses should ideally be a single sentence. :)
one example is: My hypothesis has a conclusion....
For a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. A working hypothesis is a provisionally accepted hypothesis proposed for further research.
If you use more than one variable, if just one (or sometimes both) works out to your hypothesis, you probably won't be able to tell which one worked.
The Hypothesis uses ONE type of sentence. And this sentence is called the IF and THEN statement.E.g.:Problem: Which bread will mold faster White Bread or Wheat Bread?Hypothesis: If Wheat bread is placed in a cold temperature, then it will mold faster.THANK YOU ALL!
Whether or not you write down an hypothesis, if you conduct an experiment, you naturally have a hypothesis since you are trying to find the answer to something and have some sort of expectations.
A hypothesis refers to a single hypothesis, or theory, whereas hypotheses refers to more than one. An example sentence would be: Scientists have posed numerous hypotheses about why the Thylacine became extinct, but my own hypothesis is that European settlement introduced a new disease that killed them off.
Yes, if the data collected will relate to more than one of them.
If you want to test your hypothesis with a controlled experiment, you should make sure you have only one variable.
it can
No. This is a sentence with only one word: "Go."
yes.
the sentence covers more than one time period.
one .
to show that their is more than one.
There is more than one. You might be thinking of the Riemann hypothesis (also called the Riemann zeta-hypothesis). Or in Complex analysis we have Riemann mapping theorem and he certainly has many more attributed to him/ So, not sure which one you want to know about.
A result which is consistent with a hypothesis adds weight to the evidence in favour of that hypothesis: it makes it more likely that the hypothesis is true. But you can never ever confirm a scientific hypothesis. The best that you can do is to show that an alternative hypothesis is unlikely. There could be another hypothesis which is better than the one you started with as well as the alternative that you compared it with: but you simply do not know.
no, or else it wont be a fact