To maintain their careers
pro: press should be able to because the celebrities sacrifice there right for freedom. they take advantage to become more known. con: celebrities should get more privacy. they should not be able to expose there private life.
well gay boy why do u ask?
Becuse they idolized the famous people
I guess to get people interested in the media
No
Sometimes they don't like the cameras. Also, they don't like the idea that people talk about them on the internet. So be respectful people!
There is no specific collective noun for celebrities. Since celebrities are people, it's appropriate to use a collective noun used for people that applies to the situation; for example a crowd of celebrities, a team of celebrities, a collection of celebrities. You can also be creative, for example a glittering of celebrities, a swarm of celebrities, a celebration of celebrities, a plague of celebrities, etc.
There is no specific collective noun for celebrities. Since celebrities are people, it's appropriate to use a collective noun used for people that applies to the situation; for example a crowd of celebrities, a team of celebrities, a collection of celebrities. You can also be creative, for example a glittering of celebrities, a swarm of celebrities, a celebration of celebrities, a plague of celebrities, etc.
To maintain their careers
you can check actors on imdb (internet movie database)
No
A Social Networking site in which members post short 'updates' where they say what they're doing at that particular moment. People like it because they can get updates and news from celebrities
Some celebrities probably do have MSN but I know for a fact that celebrities have myspace eg Brendon Urie, Pete Wents (but most people make celebrities)
Average People to Celebrities!
Yeah
pro: press should be able to because the celebrities sacrifice there right for freedom. they take advantage to become more known. con: celebrities should get more privacy. they should not be able to expose there private life.