0
What sources do historians and archaeologists use to draw conclusions about life in ancient rome?
Archaeologists and historians work hand in hand. The historian uses the ancient writers and ancient writing, the archaeologist uses various means to determine the time a building was erected, its use and its decoration. There are many branches of Archaeology and many methods used. Anthropology, a part of archaeology (or vice versa) can determine, through it's many branches the health of a community, it's diet and in many cases the causes of death and the age of death. The historian can then put all these pieces together to form a conclusion. Historians and archaeologists are two sides of the same coin, so to speak.
What else can I help you with?
What is a 8 letter word for Sources of worry?
Troubles
Which item is not a charateristic of a civilzation?
temporary structures and migrating food sources
What are the types of water transportaion?
ships and boats are the sources of water transportaton.
Where can one find more information about crossword puzzle dictionaries?
There are many great internet sources where information about crossword puzzle dictionaries can be found. Webster crossword puzzle dictionary is one of these great sources.
How do you make your own Mudkip plushie?
Follow the link below under sources...
Why are sources important to historians?
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Why are secondary sources important to historians?
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Are secondary sources important to historians?
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Why archaeologists study written sources and historians study artifacts?
Archaeologists study written sources to study human life and historians study artifacts to find more about history.
Which best explains why secondary sources are important to historians?
(Apex) They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Why do archaeologists and historians try to find artifacts and writings from ancient civilizations?
Archaeologists study written sources to study human life and historians study artifacts to find more about history.
which statement best explains why secondary sources are important to historians?
(Apex) They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Why would archaeologist study written sources and historians study artifact?
Archaeologists study written sources to study human life and historians study artifacts to find more about history.
What is the four types of clues that historians and archaeologists use?
Historians and archaeologists use primary sources (first-hand accounts), secondary sources (interpretations of primary sources), artifacts and material culture (objects from the past), and scientific methods (carbon dating, DNA analysis) to uncover and interpret historical information.
What does you do historians use to synthesize evidence and draw conclusions?
Historians use various sources of evidence such as primary documents, secondary sources, artifacts, and personal accounts to synthesize information. They analyze these sources critically to develop historical interpretations and draw conclusions about the past. By comparing and contrasting different sources, historians construct a coherent narrative to present a comprehensive understanding of historical events.
What do historians use to synthesize evidence and draw conclusions?
They compare and contrast the ideas from multiple resources
What do historians do when using the historical thinking skill of analyzing historical sources?
Answer this question… Analyze the work of other historians to draw conclusions
