0
Well. it really depends on who/what you are fighting. rune scimitar is fast and does a good amount of damage, (i think this wep is better) it is good vs. an enemy without armor where as the mace is slower, but much lighter. a mace is used vs. and enemy with armor. so if i where you i would go with the rune scimitar unless you are doing monkey madness! -miles
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Ezra
Taiga
CoachAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is Excalibur better then the rune scimitar?
haha, nope. if your f2p stick to the rune scimitar.
In Runescape is the blurite sword better than a rune scimitar?
Not even close. The Rune Scimitar is better when it comes to attack stats. The blurite sword's defense stats are actually a little better then the rune Rune Scimitar's.
Which is better a rune scimitar or rune claws?
Rune Claws. It's stats are off the hook.
What is better rune longsword or rune scimitar?
The rune longsword is slower, but has a higher max hit by 1, but the rune scimitar is faster but has some unnecessary bonuses and is expensive, so the rune longsword is best.
Which is better rune scimitar or rune 2h sword?
in my oppinion the R scimmy is the better one because its faster then the 2h sword and you can wear a shield wich are necessary for dragon slaying etc but i thout that the rune 2h dide more damage A: A Rune Scimitar attacks with an Attack Speed of 6 (every 2.4 seconds) and a Rune 2H Sword attacks with an Attack Speed of 3 (every 3.6 seconds) meaning you can attack a lot more often with a Rune Scimitar, but the Rune 2H has a higher max hit as it provides a bigger strength bonus. Overall if you are looking for a weapon to train your combat skills the Rune Scimitar is the better choice, while a Rune 2H Sword can be very useful in PVP as it provides sudden high damage, which means you can kill people with a high hit before they are capable of using food. id say if you had low than 70 strengh then use a rune scimitar and a rune 2h for over 70 strengh
