Well answering your question; sorry in advance for any spelling errors.
I'm severely dyslexic, and not good at count down or those games where you jumble up the letters and have to make long words. I can normally only get a couple or lots of little three letter words, and won't see the links to make bigger ones. For example, if I found the word dad, I would not make a link to see, and make the word daddy, and so on.
Also on count down conundrum, I can't ever work out those anagrams. I only ever see the new words that are there, but none the less I'm quite good at the math on the program.
I know it's not too clear what I'm talking about countdown, but I'm only doing my GCSEs and that was the only thing I could relate to demonstrating my point on dyslexic people; well most, I'm speaking from my own personal experience, that anagrams for dyslexics are quite hard, even though one of the symptoms that dyslexia sufferers complain of jumping, and jumbling letters on a page of text. So, you would assume dyslexics could work it out seeing all kind of words. I wish it were true.
Chat with our AI personalities
Yes, because they can see (for short anagrams at least) how the letters have been rearranged. Seeing many solutions does improve the ability of average individuals to recognize similar anagrams, but not as greatly as actually working out a solution.As with other puzzles where the solution is already known to the puzzle creator, there is no intrinsic value to solving anagrams. The focus of many anagrammers is to show how language has created words using the same letters that have some apt connection, as in the anagrams silent and listen.
There are two anagrams of the word pliers.These anagrams are lisper and perils.
There are two anagrams of the letters 'dearcash'.These anagrams are charades and hardcase.
Anagrams
The anagrams are limestone and milestone.