Given a set of dependencies F on R, the projection of F on Ri, denoted by
'lTR(F) where Ri is a subset of R, is the set of dependencies X ---.. Y in P+ such that the
attributes in X U Yare all contained in Ri• Hence, the projection of F on each relation
schema Ri in the decomposition D is the set of functional dependencies in P+, the closure
of F, such that all their left- and right-hand-side attributes are in Ri• We say that a
decomposition D '= {R[, Rz, ... , Rm} of R is dependency-preserving with respect to F if
the union of the projections of F on each Ri in D is equivalent to F; that is,
(('lTR (F» U ... U ('lTR (F)W '= P+
Dependency
A DEPENDENCY X->Y IS SAID TO BE TRIVIAL DEPENDENCY IF Y IS A PROPER SUBSET OF X OTHERWISE NON TRIVIAL DEPENDENCY.
Dependency after birth.
A DEPENDENCY X->Y IS SAID TO BE TRIVIAL DEPENDENCY IF Y IS A PROPER SUBSET OF X OTHERWISE NON TRIVIAL DEPENDENCY.
Ross Dependency's motto is 'Not applicable'.
Ross Dependency was created in 160.
The population of Ross Dependency is 1,000.
Ross Dependency's population is 200.
Easter Island is a dependency of Chile.
Dependency. You were close haha :)
-->non trivial functional dependency is totally opposite to the trivial functional dependency. --> non trivial dependency means X-->Y that is if Y is not proper subset of X table or relation with X then it said to be non trivial functional dependency.
A DEPENDENCY X->Y IS SAID TO BE TRIVIAL DEPENDENCY IF Y IS A PROPER SUBSET OF X OTHERWISE NON TRIVIAL DEPENDENCY.