Your sister-in-law is either the sister of your spouse or the wife of your brother.
If your sister-in-law is the wife of your brother, then her husband is your brother, not your brother-in-law.
If your sister-in-law is the sister of your spouse, then her husband is not related to you.
In either case her husband is your children's uncle.
William and Alice are married. William and Carol are siblings. Alice and Frank are siblings.
Carol is Alice's sister in law. Frank is William's brother in law. Carol and Frank are not related to one another.
Another answer:Yes. The term "in-law" comes from canon law (as opposed to common law). Canon law is law that governs the conduct of a faith's membership. In this case, the term refers to a relationship that is "not natural," that is, not by blood. So, your in-laws are granted a relationship that is between having no relationship and having blood relationship to you. Anyone of a blood relationship on the "in-law" side of the relationship are also considered your in-laws (father-in-law, son-in-law, brother-in-law, etc.).There are two ways you can have a brother-in-law. The brother of your spouse is your brother-in-law and the husband of your sister is your brother-in-law.
If the husband of your sister has a brother, that brother is not related to you, although he is your sister's brother-in-law.
If the brother of your spouse has a brother (who is not married to you) that brother is also your brother-in-law. But the relationship is because both are brothers of your spouse.
In Hindi, the term for brother-in-law is "ΰ€¦ΰ₯ΰ€΅ΰ€°" (devar) for husband's younger brother or "ΰ€ΰ₯ΰ€ΰ€Ύ" (jija) for sister's husband.
Unfaithful, a cheater and many other names that are inappropriate for me to say on this website.
The Sita Alice JANAki is the founded child of King Janak hi hasn't child sita is single daughter of RAJA JAnak so Ram had has no brother in low
The custom is to mention the person you are speaking to first, then any other person, then yourself. For example: You and your husband; You and my husband; Your husband and I; My husband and I; You, your husband and I; You, my husband and I.
Your husband's sister is your sister-in-law. Her husband is your husband's brother-in-law. But your sister-in-law's husband is not related to you.
Your husband's sister is your sister-in-law. Her husband is your husband's brother-in-law. But your sister-in-law's husband is not related to you.
Your husband's sister is your sister-in-law. Her husband is not related to you.
No. Your husband's brother-in-law would be your brother or the husband of your husband's sister. Your sister is your husband's sister-in-law. Your sister's husband is your brother-in-law but the English language has no term to describe a relationship between your husband and your sister's husband. In everyday English usage, however, your sister's husband is referred to as your husband's brother-in-law, yes. But it isn't exactly correct.
The form 'allow your husband and me' is correct. The pronoun 'me' is part of the compound object of the verb 'allow'. Example: If you allow your husband and me a little more time we can finish. Other correct examples are using 'your husband and me' as the object of a preposition: ... for your husband and me ... ... from your husband and me ... ... by your husband and me ... ... near your husband and me ... ... to your husband and me ... An easy way to figure out whether I or ME is correct is to remove "your husband" from the sentence. Try it with just I or ME. You should be able to figure out which one is right. Then, add "your husband" back in. Adding "your husband" does not change whether I or ME is correct. Be aware, that the custom is to list yourself last. You should say: Your husband and I, Your husband and me. You should not say: I and your husband. Me and your husband.
Husband in Hawaiian is "mΔkua kΔne".
No. In the languages f the cultures derived from Europe, your sister is your husband's sister-in-law but her husband is not related to your husband.
No, you should not call a dead husband an ex-husband. He should be referred to as the woman's late husband if they were married at the time of his death.