.......
They hanged him, and let his dead body poison the water for the townspeople.
The cast of Study After Cruel Intentions - 2010 includes: Lysette Anthony as Charlotte Sharon Maughan as Lie
No. They're cruel leaders!
Yes. He was a very fierce leader.
slap another person
the band members of Darling Cruel are gregory darling (vocals and piano) danny bardot (guitar) erik gloege (drums) janis massy (sax, flute and background vocals)
other people convicted as criminals. crucifixion was a particularly cruel method of execution, but Christ was not the only one who suffered this means of death.
None, quadratics are a torture method invented by a particularly cruel middle age teacher.
I believe not. In Texas, years ago, our execution method was changed from the electric chair to lethal injection on the grounds that electrocution was cruel and unusual. If I understand lethal injection , there is no pain involved. The only question is that of whether or not execution itself is cruel or unusual. Is it unusual? No. People have been executed through the ages and will be executed for all time to come. Is it cruel? I say no. There is no pain inolved.
It is difficult to determine the specific context of the execution you are referring to as there have been numerous instances of cruel executions throughout history. However, executions are generally deemed cruel when they involve prolonged suffering, torture, or extreme methods that go beyond the intended purpose of punishment. The cruelty may be subjective in nature as it depends on cultural norms and perceptions of what is considered humane.
Crucifixion is considered one of the most brutal forms of execution due to its prolonged and excruciating nature. Victims often endured significant physical pain from nails driven through their limbs, as well as severe blood loss and asphyxiation over time. The psychological torment of public humiliation and the slow, torturous death made it a particularly cruel method of punishment. Historically, it was used not only to execute but also to serve as a deterrent to others.
No. Though it has rarely been used outside of wartime, no case has ever been successfully brought against the practice in the United States. It has only ever been used as a method of execution in 4 states, is no longer used in 2 of those, and is only currently a backup option to lethal injection in 2. The U.S. Supreme Court has only once heard the case that the firing squad is cruel and unusual, and in that case, Wilkerson v. Utah (1878), the Court found that the firing squad did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. The last case of firing squad execution in the United States was in Utah in 1996 and was elected by the condemned. Utah removed the option for firing squad execution in 2004. A 1993 survey suggested that Firing Squad was more painful to the condemned only than execution by lethal injection, below electrocution, the second most common method of execution in the United States.
The authorities will crucify you if you get caught stealing.
Crucifixion is no longer practiced as a form of punishment in any country. It has been widely condemned as a cruel and inhumane method of execution, and most countries have abolished it in favor of more humane forms of punishment.
yes she did, after a rebellion, mary became cruel and ordered her execution.
It was cruel, but not unfair; everybody went the same way
Genocides are generally ordered by strong-willed individuals motivated by powerful ideologies. In terms of the actual organization, e.g. building of camps, coordinating military movements, determining the method of execution, etc., this is usually entrusted to engineers and logisticians who happen to be aligned with the cruel dictator.
Whaling itself is not, but every method ever used is cruel.