answersLogoWhite

0

He isn't, Piggy also doubts its existence, as he says "They don't make sense, radios and TV and things wouldn't work if there were beasties and ghosts." At the meeting were the issue of a "beastie" was first raised Ralph stated a number of times, "There is no beast."

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

RossRoss
Every question is just a happy little opportunity.
Chat with Ross
SteveSteve
Knowledge is a journey, you know? We'll get there.
Chat with Steve
EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra
More answers

Simon was not the only one who doubted the existence of the beast. At the meeting where the beastie was first raised Ralph insisted, "But there is no beast." Ralph also called another meeting to settle once and for all that there was no such thing as a beast. At that meeting Piggy also refuted the possibility of a beast by stating that "Things wouldn't work, radios and TV and things, they wouldn't make sense if there were beasts and ghosts and stuff, its not scientific." After Ralph called for a vote to decide if there might be such a thing as the beast Piggy stated, "And remember that I voted NO for the beast."

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

Simon is not the only boy to doubt the existence of the beast. When the beast was first mentioned at the second meeting, when it was referred to a snake-thing or beastie, Ralph stated several time, and I quote, "But there is no beast." Later, after the vote in favour of ghosts in the meeting in chapter 5, Ralph says "The trouble is: Are there ghosts, Piggy? Or Beasts?" Piggy said, and I quote, "Course there aren't."

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
User Avatar

Because it makes no sense to him that a beast with sharp claws and wings would be unable to catch one of the twins, Samneric. Logic tells him that they just misinterpreted something else and he resolves to find out just what it really was.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
User Avatar

Simon is not the only boy to doubt the existence of the beast. When the beast was first mentioned at the second meeting, when it was referred to a snake-thing or beastie, Ralph stated several time, and I quote, "But there is no beast." Later, after the vote in favour of ghosts in the meeting in chapter 5, Ralph says "The trouble is: Are there ghosts, Piggy? Or Beasts?" Piggy said, and I quote, "Course there aren't."

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
User Avatar

Golding is trying to show how the boys are confused about whether or not he is Simon, or if he is the Beast. By changing back and forth from calling him Simon, and calling him the Beast, it shows the audience the confusion that the boys were feeling in that moment.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
User Avatar

He knows that the real beast is the fear and evil inside the boys. Simon is a Christ figure in the book, so it makes sense that he would have a deeper understanding.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

He knows that the real beast is the fear and evil inside the boys. Simon is a Christ figure in the book, so it makes sense that he would have a deeper understanding.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

he's intelligent and knows deep down that there is no beast, that the beast is the savagery the kids are turning into.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
User Avatar

//

User Avatar

Anonymous

4y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why has the narrator referred to Simon as the beast?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp