If you are suggesting in pure strength I would assume Brock Lesnar would be at the top of the list. If you are thinking in wrestling terms only I would personally pick Undertaker due to the fact that his career has had such longevity that he is not a rookie by any means. The Strongest out of the 4 would be Bill Goldberg, he gorilla press slammed both Batista (who was 320 pounds at that time) and Brock lesnar (300 pounds) and who could forget him press slamming Scott steiner 6 times (like taunting him for the push-ups he does)..now that is something neither Brock has done nor Batista can do The 4 powerful would be....Goldberg>Brock>Batista>Undertaker If you do some weight comparisons to start with, they're all in the high 300lb zone, Batista weighed for a long time 318lbs. to be 318lbs at 6'5" would require IMMENSE muscles. if you look at Batista he looks like a bodybuilder and aesthetically looks like hes got more muscular superiority than Goldberg, Brock or taker. i would go as far as to say that Batista's the most psychically superior wrestler on the WWE roster today. and i also think that, if they ever were to clash (and that's very unlikely), Batista would also floor hulk hogan.
well you have the big times like hogan Austin undertaker Kurt angle brock lesnar but i would say the rock is the best in the gb game wwe wrestlemania xix. Cause he is fast and strong un like hulk hogan he is not that fast but he is strong. And the rock has a finisher every ware. he has a ground finisher a Irish whip finisher a normal he only dosent have a back finisher wich is hader to do so what ever so if say your on the ground your screwd. peoples elbow try to revers it.
In the world of WWE, strength can be measured in various ways, including physical prowess, in-ring performance, and character development. It is difficult to definitively determine who the "stronger" man is, as each wrestler brings a unique set of skills and attributes to the ring. Wrestlers such as Brock Lesnar, John Cena, and Roman Reigns are often considered among the strongest in terms of athleticism and in-ring dominance. Ultimately, the concept of strength in WWE is subjective and can vary depending on individual preferences and criteria.
Colby Brock's favorite color is black, You could hear Sam say it in a Birthday party video for Colby
Although the Undertaker is make believe, it eat's nothing for it lives a ghost's life(or should I say afterlife?).
John Cena is WAY better than Brock Lesnar.
I'd say at the moment, Brock Lesnar.
There is a lot of speculation over that. People say that either Kane, the undertaker, chris Jericho, Brock lesnar, mr McMahon, skip Sheffield or Goldust will make a return. Not sure which one yet.
Of course it is all personal opinions, but I would have to say that a majority of the new WWE superstars are knock offs of the older ones such as: *Brock Lesnar *Goldburg *Stone Cold *Undertaker *Kane *Big Show *Rey Mysterio *Triple H *The Rock *Kurt Angle *Eddie Guerrero and so on.
If you are suggesting in pure strength I would assume Brock Lesnar would be at the top of the list. If you are thinking in wrestling terms only I would personally pick Undertaker due to the fact that his career has had such longevity that he is not a rookie by any means. The Strongest out of the 4 would be Bill Goldberg, he gorilla press slammed both Batista (who was 320 pounds at that time) and Brock lesnar (300 pounds) and who could forget him press slamming Scott steiner 6 times (like taunting him for the push-ups he does)..now that is something neither Brock has done nor Batista can do The 4 powerful would be....Goldberg>Brock>Batista>Undertaker If you do some weight comparisons to start with, they're all in the high 300lb zone, Batista weighed for a long time 318lbs. to be 318lbs at 6'5" would require IMMENSE muscles. if you look at Batista he looks like a bodybuilder and aesthetically looks like hes got more muscular superiority than Goldberg, Brock or taker. i would go as far as to say that Batista's the most psychically superior wrestler on the WWE roster today. and i also think that, if they ever were to clash (and that's very unlikely), Batista would also floor hulk hogan.
He quit because he faught with goldberg in a fight that he was supposed to win. But goldberg never followed the script and ended up destroying brock lesnar. so brock lesnar quit because he got mad. he then went to the UFC did well for a while when he started doing bad he quit and went back to the wwe. then he quit the wwe again.
I do to he is the most total BEST! I <3 UNDERTAKER
It was Undertaker vs Imposter Undertaker.
I would say that his disease "Diverticultis" ended his career. Lesnar first suffered from Diverticultis, underwent surgery and returned back to the UFC but he was unable to recover from his second bout of the same illness. After his second surgery and recovery, Lesnar came back to fight Alistair Overeem but was unable to fight at a 100% because of his illness. As a result of this, he retired after the fight. If Lesnar were a 100% and did not have to undergo two surgeries due to his illness, I doubt if Overeem or anyone else could've defeated him.
well this is an opinion question and I don't want to start a huge fight so I'll say both. (in my opinion the Undertaker, a few weeks ago the undertaker did hi famous pile-driver to randy orton)
people say a diva attack the undertaker
well you have the big times like hogan Austin undertaker Kurt angle brock lesnar but i would say the rock is the best in the gb game wwe wrestlemania xix. Cause he is fast and strong un like hulk hogan he is not that fast but he is strong. And the rock has a finisher every ware. he has a ground finisher a Irish whip finisher a normal he only dosent have a back finisher wich is hader to do so what ever so if say your on the ground your screwd. peoples elbow try to revers it.