It depends on the place and the size of each dog. In a snowy land, the husky can kill a rottweiler without too much injuries. In a hot grassland, the rottweiler would win the fight. The siberian husky would win the fight because it has thick fur to protect itself from injuries and has more strength than a rottweiler. If the rottweiler is bigger than the siberian husky, then it could definitely win the fight.
I think a Siberian Husky would win. Many people think a Rottweiler would because of its brute strength, but I disagree. A Husky is strong, too, and even though it might not have a powerful bite like a Rottweiler, it also agile and has fierce instincts.
I have to say Rottweiler vs Husky it would be a close battle but you must take into account Rottie is slightly bigger and are very lean and muscular. Unless of course, you feed tour dog regular brand food and a lot of junk like fast food scraps then they would be a pitch-perfect fighter, they have these attributes on their side. 1 they are muscular. 2 they are large dogs and have a good fighting stance. 3 they have a very mean bite. However, you must agree they are not the brightest when it comes to Husky which has a bloodline of fighting dogs since they are closely related to wolves and know how to fight very well when it comes to it. So, therefore, you should also take into account the muscular, lean aerodynamic body style of a Husky.So here’s what the Husky has on its side. 1 the Husky is a tall and lean dog. 2 they have close relations to wolves and have more fighting instinct. 3 they are agile or fast dog’s and if the Husky ran the Rottweiler would not even come close to catching him. 4 They are smart dogs and based on speed and personal experience the Husky is really good at dodging the Rottweilers attacks, also the Husky has a very strong bite force, just as our Rottweiler friend. So lets put this into a different scenario, say one day a dogfighting Rottweiler escapes and is running about when it sees a man walking a Husky along the street the odd’s of an attack are 50/50 but odd’s of the Husky winning this fight is about 70/30 the Rottweiler being the 70 and the Husky being 30 now if you paid attention the reason the Rottweiler has an advantage is because has been a dogfighting dog for a while and it is also very strong and athletic compared to the Husky who being a regular pet doesn’t fight a lot.
The ridgeback dog would win because it is stronger and has sharper teeth.
It depends on the owner, skills, and size of the golden retriever. However, a coyote would be a better hunter than a golden retriever since it is wild dog, but golden retrievers tend to be better fighters. The coyote might win, but it could suffer some injuries by the golden retriever.
a wolf because a husky was domesticated from a wolf and the wolf has more power and strength. because husky is home grown and wolf lives in a forest so he is wild and he knows how fight better because he lives with other wild animals thank you
Both breeds will not fight a bull. They would only chace them.
Probably the rottie, since it has a more territorial and protective nature about it than a lab typically does.
Most likely the Husky, but Danes were used as guard dogs, not sled dogs, so they would also have that kind of fighting advantage. However, they have thinner skin and not as much hair as a husky would, making it more likely to get wounded than a Husky would.
Rottweiler is a mid sized large breed , muscular too and one of the strongest breeds . so i would go i for the rottweiler to win ...
german
rotttweiler
The ridgeback dog would win because it is stronger and has sharper teeth.
Geryhound is a sprinter. Husky is a long haul dog. We all know a Greyhound would win up to maybe 5 km. After, it's the Husky's advantage.
The husky. A husky is stronger and wider than a police dog when the husky has wider jaws plus bigger size. If the police dog is aggressive, then the husky would be injured.
A Siberian tiger would win though it depends on experience and size even though the Siberian will be larger it could still go down.
Bordeaux
This question is very hard both are very strong, but kangals have a bite stronger than a rottweiler so the kangal would win! (well it depends on the rottweiler)
the leopard would win the leopard is stronger faster and have stronger claws and has a better attack and defense than a rottweiler the winner is the leopard noah davis wrote this
the rottweiler would win because of its size and its jaw is bigger then a pitbull so that would mean that it would need more muscle and also of all the dogs the rottweiler has the strongest bit that is no true about pit bulls jaws locking a bit bull jaw is as the same as anyother dog and it may win because of its speed dont get me wrong pitbulls are strong but they are a lot littler then a rottweiler and the rottweiler is a very powerful dog as well as the pit bull but in the fight and i hate dog fights a rottweiler would win