Historically Pleasantville tackles the issue of racism and bigotry. The town starts getting upset with the introduction of "color" and starts treating those with color differently than the ones in black and white. They even begin burning books which ties back to Nazi Germany. It ties back to many issues that people sadly are still struggling with today.
No. There are references and jokes, but no nudity.
The most represented historical character on film is Napoleon Bonaparte.
There really was a Roman emperor named Marcus Aurelius, and he had a son named Commodus, who succeeded him. In contrast to the movie, Marcus named Commodus his successor, rather than Maximus. However, some historians suspect Commodus did have a hand in his father's death. Commodus did not die in the arena. He was killed by a wrestler. After Commodus' death, Rome did not return to a republic as suggested in the movie. General Maximus Decimus Meridius is a fictitious character. There was a general named Avidius Cassius, who fought in the campaign depicted in the film and, upon hearing of Marcus' death, declared himself emperor of Rome. However, his own soldiers assassinated him. Later in Roman history, there was a general named Maximus, who appears to have had revolutionary ideas. Commodus really did have a sister named Lucilla, and, as depicted in the movie, she hated him. Lucilla was married to the co-emperor, Lucius Verus. Lucilla plotted to have Commodus assassinated, but Commodus had her exiled for the plot and later executed. So, unlike what happened in the movie, Commodus outlived his sister. It was another sister, not Lucilla, that Commodus was rumored to have had sexual relations. The tattoo on Maximus' arm reads, "SPQR." The letters relate to an often-used Latin phrase, Senatus Populusque Romanus, which means "the Senate and People of Rome." However, it is highly unlikely a Roman general would have such a tattoo, as tattoos were worn by foreigners and lower-class citizens.
Can't find any references to it. He did play in a horror film 'The Return of Doctor X'. The movie was about the investigation of murders that hinted at vampirism. The good Dr., played by Bogart, was doing blood related experiments.
The movie Scar Face, produced in 1983, was based on the 1932 original Scarface. Neither movie was based on a specific historical figure or event and has been classified as a mob film.
A tree is the first thing to turn to color in the film Pleasantville. The tree bursts into flames outside of the house as Mary Sue's mother is taking a bath.
In 1998, the record was broken by Gary Ross's film Pleasantville. I am looking for information about films made since then which exceed Pleasantville's 1,700 visual effects shots.
A historical film :)
The rising action in "Pleasantville" occurs as the characters begin to experience changes and challenges that disrupt the idyllic world of the town. As David and Jennifer introduce new ideas and behaviors, the townspeople start questioning their beliefs and traditions, leading to tension and conflict that escalates throughout the film.
No. There are references and jokes, but no nudity.
To show a biblical reference to the bible stories. It also shows a connection between the sequence from the film and the story of Adam and eve.
Paul is a 15 because of its sexual references and strong language.
No, it's based on a real person, but the film is Hollywood at its historical worst. I enjoyed the film as entertainment, but from an historical point of view it utter twaddle.
"The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover" is a movie that contains references to "The Canterbury Tales" by Chaucer. The film draws parallels between the characters in the movie and those in the Tales.
The most represented historical character on film is Napoleon Bonaparte.
"Pleasantville" uses the concept of a black-and-white 1950s sitcom world to depict the rigid social roles and expectations that can limit individual expression and freedom. As characters begin to break free from their assigned roles and embrace change, the film explores themes of personal growth and transformation in the face of societal constraints. Through the characters' journey to embrace individuality and diversity, the film highlights the importance of challenging traditional norms and discovering one's true self.
No! It's an enjoyable film, but not a good source of historical information. It is a fictional story and the film is made for entertainment.