US Supreme Court decision of 1964 dealing with apportionment of Congressional districts. After a suit against Georgia's apportionment statute was dismissed by the federal circuit court, the case was appealed to the Supreme Court. The Court ruled that all Congressional districts must be equal in size of voting population. The Georgia statute was declared invalid because its unequal apportionment gave greater voting power to residents of certain districts.
source: <a href="http://encyclopedia.farlex.com/Westberry+v.+Sanders">Wesberry v. Sanders</a>
V. V. Zikeev died in 1957.
V. R. V. Singh was born in 1984.
No, V is a man. However, there is a character in the story named Valerie who is a lesbian.
"V" (1983). The original mini-series. "V: The Final Battle" (1984). Mini-series sequel. "V" (1984). Television series. "V" (2009). Television series.
V. Akilesapillai was born in 1853.
Baker v. Carr (redistricting is a justiciable issue) Westbury v. Sanders (one man, one vote) Shaw v. Reno (race can't be only consideration in redistricting)
Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 US 1 (1964)Chief Justice Earl Warren (1953-1969) presided over Wesberry v. Sanders, (1964).For more information, see Related Questions, below.
IIHGG
geographic distributing
Engineer, philosopher, inventor,
One person's vote should be worth the same as another
Wesberry v. Sanders was settled by the Supreme Court in 1964. It didn't outlaw Gerrymandering, it instituted the "one person, one vote" rule which forces all congressional districts have nearly the same population. Gerrymandering hasn't been outlawed.
It changed the way many states drew district boundaries
It changed the way many states drew district boundaries.
Redistricting was not declared unconstitutional in the 1963 case Gray v. Sanders. It was after that.
Before the landmark Supreme Court case Wesberry v. Sanders in 1964, congressional districts in many states were drawn without much regard for equal population representation. Instead, districts were often drawn based on political considerations and gerrymandering tactics, allowing for unequal representation and potentially disenfranchising some voters. Wesberry v. Sanders established the principle of "one person, one vote," requiring that congressional districts be drawn to have roughly equal populations to ensure more equitable representation.
Supreme Court decision in Wesberry v. Sanders