Although a gorilla is one of the strongest land animals on the planet, the polar bear has 6 inch claws that could easily tear a silverback to shreds before it could get a good enough punch on it. polar bears are also larger then gorillas giving quite an advantage. So definitely the polar
That's correct but I'll give the answer in more detail, An adult male Polar bear can be 10 feet (3 metres) on its hind legs, they can weight up to 680 kg and lift a weight equivalent to two tonnes. An adult male Silver back gorilla can weight up to 230 kg, and can lift the equivalent of 500 kg of weight. Male silverbacks are usually between 5'9-6'2 feet tall (1.5-1.7 metres). A polar bear is carnivorous and therefore has powerful canines and jaws, whilst a gorilla is herbivorous but yet has hundreds of muscles throughout the body. Due to the polar bears' size, weight and diet it would have to win; as it's triple a gorillas MAXIMUM weight, polar bears have alot of fur and blubber, and finally razor sharp 5 inch claws would allow it to rip the ape to shreds. Also, gorillas do not punch, rather they throw stuff or grab in order to defend itself, so grabbing at a polar bear's thick fur is definitely no defense against those sharp claws and teeth.
Definitely the polar bear would win. Polar bears are very huge in size compared with gorillas and have strong claws/jaws that could easily destroy the gorilla. Since gorillas only throw sticks/stones, pound their chests, or tear with their powerful hands, a gorilla would be dead after the deadly swipes.
A polar bear would win,Polar bears are 5.3 feet tall but average 5.1 ft,are 12 feet long and weigh 1760 lbs(800 kg). Grizzlys are 1100 lbs(500 kg),stand 3.5 feet and are 9.5 feet long. Its like lion vs tiger lion wins
The grizzly would win because of its size and claws
Both bears are powerful, but the Grizzly is several pounds smaller than the Polar Bear and it is likely that after a bloody and invigorating fight the larger and more powerful polar bear will emerge victorious.
The polar bear is the biggest bear at a weight of 770 to 1,500 pounds,while the grizzly bear is of 300 to 1,200 pounds.The polar bear is more agile and bigger than the grizzly if they where the same size polar bear will still win because it is more adapted to fight than the grizzly,although the grizzly could win the fight depends of the individuals.Polar bear 6/10
Polar bears are known to be the most aggressive bear and polar bears are on average bigger than grizzly bears. Polar bears have adapted themselves to extreme climates so they have better survival skills. They would not come into contact with each other. It would also depend on the sex of the two bears. More than likely the polar bear would win.
The polar bear is the largest predator that lives on land. Adult males weigh 352-680 kg (780-1,500 lb) and measure 2.4-3 m (7.9-9.8 ft) in length. Adult females are roughly half the size of males and normally weigh 150-249 kg (330-550 lb), measuring 1.8-2.4 metres (5.9-7.9 ft) in length.
Exceptionally large male grizzly bears can reach weights of 454.5 kilograms (1,000 pounds) and stand 2.44 metres (8 ft) tall on their hind legs; the females are on average 38% smaller.
The polar bear's claws are short and stocky compared to those of the brown bear, perhaps to serve the former's need to grip heavy prey and ice. The claws are deeply scooped on the underside to assist in digging in the ice of the natural habitat.
The 42 teeth of a polar bear reflect its highly carnivorous diet. The cheek teeth are smaller and more jagged than in the brown bear, and the canines are larger and sharper.
Unlike grizzly bears, polar bears are not territorial. Although stereotyped as being voraciously aggressive, they are normally cautious in confrontations, and often choose to escape rather than fight.
I would say that a Polar bear would win for sure because on average, the polar bear is much larger than an average sized brown bear.
Polar bears have sharp claws that are as long as daggers while grizzly bears have claws that are as long as knives. Grizzly bears have smaller jaws and a shorter height than a polar bear. In a fair fight, a polar bear will have a higher chance of winning such a fight.
Though it certainly is possible that a polar bear could kill a wolverine, especially since the polar bears are often 10 times the size of a wolverine, in most witnessed accounts, the wolverine wins. There was a loosely documented account from 1897, as well as a report from 1944 from the Alaskan State Wildlife Authority, where a guide witnesses a polar bear attack a wolverine. The wolverine clamped onto the polar bear's throat and suffocated it. It is noteworthy that this is very similar to the way in which a mongoose (of the weasel family like the wolverine) kills a cobra. Mustelidae are known to kill animals much larger than them by being quicker, more cunning, and in the wolverine's case, just plane ferocious.
A polar bear is feeding on carcass and a grizzly bear
Wants food it stands up on its back let's and growls
The polar bear growls back the grizzly bear charges
But it bluffs and sprints behind vegetation the polar
Bear waits for the grizzly bear to make another move
The grizzly pounced and bites the polar bears neck
Killing polar bear WINNER 🏆 grizzly bear wins
Heaviest tiger was 900 pouds, but the heaviest polar bear was over 2000 pounds.
a tiger is my favorite animal but as much as i think a tiger could take a ploar bear, i think a liger would waste a polar bear, so i would say liger You can't really say a liger would win because no one's ever made them fight. If you put them together they might mate instead. Siberian Liger OH GOD. As the one said above me I don't think he knows what he's talking about polar bear vs tigers but I think a liger would be win against tiger because it has a better reach and more strength though it doesn't have a fighting experience but he still got his instinct of fighting. Even though Ligers have health problems with their bones and joints also they are sluggish due to their size but in head to head combat Ligers would emerged victorious.
rhino
Simon Reay is the cameraman for the show Man vs Wild featuring Bear Grylls.
He is more commonly known as "Bear Grylls" and he is the host of "Man vs Wild" on Discovery channel...
The tusks of the walrus could kill the bear, but if the polar bear can get past the tusks it could kill the walrus.
It's hard to know. They're both strong and heavy. but it would probably be the bear in the end
Heaviest tiger was 900 pouds, but the heaviest polar bear was over 2000 pounds.
Bear would win
gorilla little vs tiger , tiger wins , big gorilla vs tiger , gorilla wins
gorilla
The cast of Banana vs Gorilla - 2009 includes: Doug Seidel as Gorilla
Lion attacks nile river crocodile, and tries to reach its stomach, but the crocodile is too strong and mean. Lion runs away. Siberian Tiger attacks nile river crocodile, and jumps on its back digging its claws in its flesh. Silverback gorilla fights the lion, and the lion kills the gorilla. Grizzly bear attacks the crocodile and the crocodile manages to drag it, but the bear runs to the back and tries to bite the crocodile. The crocodile's tail whips back and forth, but the bear scratches the tail and bites it hard. The crocodile is injured badly, and the tiger jumps in for the kill. The lion charges at the siberian tiger, but the tiger jumps back at the lion. The grizzly bear waits and starts eating the dead crocodile and the dead gorilla. After the lion died, the siberian tiger fights the grizzly bear. The grizzly bear tries to bite the tiger, but the tiger runs from the bear. The tiger jumps on the bear and gives a bite on the throat, the bear lays dead. Siberian tiger is winner.
The cast of Superman vs. the Gorilla Gang - 1965 includes: Roy Barcroft as Gorilla Gang Member Kenne Duncan as Gorilla Gang Member
gorrila
Gorilla vs Elephant? The Elephant no contest
Bear vs. Shark ended in 2005.