answersLogoWhite

0

Well he said in recent episode that 1978 was before his time. So, he must be younger than 32.

He would have been 16 when his son was born if he was only 32. I consider '72 before my time because I was only six and don't remember anything "before my time". So, I'm guessing that Paul is a VERY good forty-someth

ing. Not as OLD as me but not a whole lot younger. Just wish I had his hair :+}

Actually, what he said was that 78's (the records) were before his time.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?