There are no different TYPES as I'm aware of at all. Pseudocode is nothing in particular. It's just a way of mapping out an algorithm of some kind without going into specific details about how it will be performed in any specific programming language. The nature of how one may write down their own particular brand of psedocode is heavily based on whatever language they feel most akin to using.
Pseudocode is used to convey an understanding rather than getting bogged down with any specific language so pseudocode having any FORMAL structure is just an oxymoron.
It's great when you trying to convey a point to a group of programers who are all writing in different languages.
SPOK (Structured Prose Organizer for KEDIT) is a pseudocode design tool. (SPOK4 at Verizon.Net)
structured English resembles spoken Englishwhere as pseudocode resembles programming languageWhat_are_the_differences_between_structured_English_and_pseudo_code
No. Pseudocode is not used to write complete programs; rather, it is an overview of what you want to achieve. For example, the following pseudocode is for a program to print a list of square roots: for i = 1 to 10 show i, i*i A specific programming language may not have a "show" command, and the structure of the "for" loop might be different; additional setup and cleanup commands may also be required in a real computer program; the purpose of this pseudoce is merely to explain, to a human, what you want to achieve. The real code, with more detail, will have to be added later.
enables the programmer to concentrate on algorithms.
pseudocode
pseudocode
There are no different TYPES as I'm aware of at all. Pseudocode is nothing in particular. It's just a way of mapping out an algorithm of some kind without going into specific details about how it will be performed in any specific programming language. The nature of how one may write down their own particular brand of psedocode is heavily based on whatever language they feel most akin to using. Pseudocode is used to convey an understanding rather than getting bogged down with any specific language so pseudocode having any FORMAL structure is just an oxymoron. It's great when you trying to convey a point to a group of programers who are all writing in different languages.
pseudocode
SPOK (Structured Prose Organizer for KEDIT) is a pseudocode design tool. (SPOK4 at Verizon.Net)
structured English resembles spoken Englishwhere as pseudocode resembles programming languageWhat_are_the_differences_between_structured_English_and_pseudo_code
Develop an algorithm to display all prime numbers from 2 to 100. Give both the pseudocode version and the flowchart version. Convert your pseudocode into a Java program.
There are different ways of writing a pseudocode statement but the concept remains, it can be presented: /*Declare variables Total (number (3)) = 0 A (number (2)) =10 B (number (2)) =14 begin Total=A+B end
pseudocode is a sentence-like representation of a piece of code while a trace table is a technique used to test a algorithms.
No. Pseudocode is not used to write complete programs; rather, it is an overview of what you want to achieve. For example, the following pseudocode is for a program to print a list of square roots: for i = 1 to 10 show i, i*i A specific programming language may not have a "show" command, and the structure of the "for" loop might be different; additional setup and cleanup commands may also be required in a real computer program; the purpose of this pseudoce is merely to explain, to a human, what you want to achieve. The real code, with more detail, will have to be added later.
There is no standard for pseudocode. Pseudocode is generally expected to be intuitively understood by its target audience, but it doesn't need similarity with natural language or familiar programming language. Therefore, all the following are pseudocode examples to increment a variable called rep: rep = rep + 1 add 1 to rep increment rep ++rep next rep
enables the programmer to concentrate on algorithms.
pseudocode