The result gathered from a periodical test does reflect towards the evaluation of a curriculum in terms of being able to reassess its effectiveness in the student's performance. In theory, a set of subjects within a given curriculum should be easily learned by the students. There has to be something wrong when the results from a periodical examination come back with a high percentage of failures. The students can be blamed to a certain degree but isn’t it the job of the school to gain most if not all of the learner's interest. It is up to the establishment’s thinkers to design, adjust, and readjust techniques to provide the best learning tools, in terms of environment, activities, and curriculum. If most of the learners constantly fail in their periodical exams, then maybe it’s time to look for adjustments in the way things are done.
Chat with our AI personalities
Periodic tests can provide valuable feedback on the effectiveness of a curriculum by assessing student understanding and performance at various stages. However, they should be supplemented with other evaluation methods to ensure a comprehensive assessment of the curriculum's impact on student learning.
The periodical exam will be the basis whether the students have learned something or not, what they do not understand and what they're good at. This can also tell which parts of the topic the students find hard to understand so that teachers can give further explanations.
Monroe’s result survey is a tool used in curriculum development to gather information about students' attitudes, beliefs, and experiences related to a particular subject. By using this survey, educators can better understand their students' needs and interests, which can then inform the design and implementation of an effective curriculum.
Ongoing evaluation is required because in life circumstances change. These changes usually result in effects on existing processes. The ongoing evaluation of these effects allow you to take proactive steps to insure that your processes remain relevant and effective.
Without a curriculum or program, there would be no structured plan for teaching and learning. This could result in inconsistent education delivery, lack of clear learning objectives, and difficulty in assessing student progress. Students may also miss out on essential knowledge and skills needed for their academic and personal development.
You are able to find pleasure in working with another person because you consider this person as a partner and not as a competitor. Through partnership, the task is done cooperatively and more easily. -- AGHCE
The advantages of the revised basic education curriculum are that they outline the easiest possible paths for creating a severly under-educated student as to follow the current trend. The disadvantage is that we have allowed the teachers union to have control over this and education in general for 40 years; producing the result of virtually illiterate children after graduation.