0
The result gathered from a periodical test does reflect towards the evaluation of a curriculum in terms of being able to reassess its effectiveness in the student's performance. In theory, a set of subjects within a given curriculum should be easily learned by the students. There has to be something wrong when the results from a periodical examination come back with a high percentage of failures. The students can be blamed to a certain degree but isn’t it the job of the school to gain most if not all of the learner's interest. It is up to the establishment’s thinkers to design, adjust, and readjust techniques to provide the best learning tools, in terms of environment, activities, and curriculum. If most of the learners constantly fail in their periodical exams, then maybe it’s time to look for adjustments in the way things are done.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Maxine
Coach
TaigaPeriodic tests can provide valuable feedback on the effectiveness of a curriculum by assessing student understanding and performance at various stages. However, they should be supplemented with other evaluation methods to ensure a comprehensive assessment of the curriculum's impact on student learning.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is about Monroe's result survey in curriculum development?
Monroe’s result survey is a tool used in curriculum development to gather information about students' attitudes, beliefs, and experiences related to a particular subject. By using this survey, educators can better understand their students' needs and interests, which can then inform the design and implementation of an effective curriculum.
Why can evaluation of a process be an ongoing process?
Evaluation of a process can be ongoing to continuously monitor its effectiveness, identify areas for improvement, and ensure that it remains aligned with organizational goals. By conducting regular evaluations, organizations can adapt to changing circumstances, incorporate feedback, and drive continuous improvement.
What would happen if we didn't have a curriculum or program?
Without a curriculum or program, there would be no structured plan for teaching and learning. This could result in inconsistent education delivery, lack of clear learning objectives, and difficulty in assessing student progress. Students may also miss out on essential knowledge and skills needed for their academic and personal development.
Thoughts on cooperation and partnership in curriculum design?
Cooperation and partnership in curriculum design are valuable because they offer diverse perspectives, expertise, and ideas, leading to more comprehensive and innovative curricula. Collaborating with others can also improve the quality of the curriculum, ensure alignment with educational goals, and enhance the implementation process through shared resources and responsibilities. Overall, working together in curriculum design can result in more engaging, relevant, and effective learning experiences for students.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of the revised basic education curriculum?
Advantages: The revised curriculum may address gaps in the old curriculum, incorporate updated content and teaching methods, and align with current educational standards. Disadvantages: It may require substantial teacher training and support for implementation, could face resistance from educators and stakeholders accustomed to the old system, and may need time to show its effectiveness in improving student outcomes.
