Structural functionalism is a macro level perspective (tries to explain large scale social phenomenon) that believes society is an organized, harmonious bundle of social institutions. The institutions such as educational, religious, economic, etc. all function together. The natural state of society is one of harmony. Everything is society has a function (hence the name functionalism). Since it thinks everything has a function, it justifies the status quo (the existing society) and is conservative.
S-F would argue that poverty would not exist in society if it did not serve a function. Poverty employs a lot of people (social workers, non-profit organizations like thesalvation army, united way, medicaid, etc., politicians who focus on policies relating to the poor). This is your strongest answer.
Wealth and poverty are god-given and transient to shape life and soul realisation.
US and Britain
this means freedom from poverty
clothing
There is no country in the world that does not have poverty. The percentage can be high or low. There is poverty in Croatia.
c_u_n_t_s
Wealth and poverty are god-given and transient to shape life and soul realisation.
US and Britain
People deserve to be protected from serious poverty.
The institutional view is generally considered preferable because it aims to prevent poverty and social issues by providing comprehensive support systems, such as healthcare and education, to all members of society. In contrast, the residual view only provides benefits to those who fall into poverty or crisis, which can lead to gaps in coverage and perpetuate inequalities.
In my point of view the main reasons of population growth is poverty and illiteracy.
Utzel calling his daughter Poverty is fitting because he sees her as a burden and a limitation in his life. Naming her Poverty reflects his negative view of her existence and his perception of her as something that brings hardship and lack into his life. It reveals his resentment towards her and his deep-seated dissatisfaction with his circumstances.
(For Apex Learning) Gender stratification.
the different kinds of poverty are income poverty, non-income poverty, relative poverty and absolute poverty.
Answer 31/05/2009 This is not a text from the Bible, but from an address given by the late Pope John Paul II concerning poverty, on one of the occasions he visited Africa. The full quote is below: "The poor should not be ashamed of their poverty, nor disdain the charity of the rich, for they should have especially in view the Redeemer, who, though he might have been born in riches, made Himself poor that he might ennoble poverty and enrich it with incomparable merits for heaven" Related link:http://cozay.com/
It depends on who you are and where you live. To live in poverty means that you can not or chose not to earn the means where by you can maintain your health and well being. And the health and well being of those for which you assume responsibility. the Idea of what is poverty for example is far different when seen from the point of view of a welfare recipient in the developed world or a person that just lost everything in Haiti.
No, poverty breeds poverty.