On average, yes, capitalist countries have more crime, but this is correlation not causation. The reasons that capitalist countries typically have more crime is that fewer of them are police states and more of them have less restrictive gun laws. The monetary policies of capitalism or socialism have no effect on crime.
Capitalist: class ownership, wages system, production for sale.
truee
Of course it is. Do a simple statistical analysis of the instances of normative 'crimes', such as burglary, theft and assault in nations with strong centralized, regulated markets and nations with laissez-faire libertarianist market policies and the conclusion should be quickly apparentAnswerNot necessarily. Capitalist countries just have better systems for compiling and reporting statistics. The statistics reported by capitalist countries are more reliable because they're normally reported by both government and independent agencies. For example, totalitarian governments tend to report statistics based on politics rather than facts; countries with ongoing unrest or war may not report crime at all when murder, robbery, or rape are a way of life and may go unchecked or may be government sanctioned. Another element that can affect reporting crime from country to country, is what is considered a crime in one country, may not be in another. Capitalist countries tend to have much higher standards for passing laws and punishments for acts against citizens. Capitalist countries also use more resources and technologies for detecting crime, apprehending criminals, and prosecuting crime.Monaco and Dubai are examples of very capitalist countries (don't bother to come if you don't plan to spend a lot of money), yet have very low crime rates.
Poorly. To put more of a fine point on it, its capitalist just like the US and most countries.
Italy has a mixed economy due to the differences between North and the South , the first one is more industrialized and the second one more agricultural.
Capitalist: class ownership, wages system, production for sale.
There are no purely socialist or capitalist countries. In a purely socialist one, there is no unemployment, the state will find something for you to do. In a purely capitalist one, there is always some unemployment, but small and transitory. Private charities would make up for what shortfalls took place. In mixed economies, there are a mixed bag of responses. Unemployment benefits help. As do various aid programs, such as food stamps and utility assistance plans. The more "socialist", the more such programs are likely to exist. The more capitalist, the more such problems as unemployment are unlikely to exist, with charities taking up the slack.
There are no purely socialist or capitalist countries. In a purely socialist one, there is no unemployment, the state will find something for you to do. In a purely capitalist one, there is always some unemployment, but small and transitory. Private charities would make up for what shortfalls took place. In mixed economies, there are a mixed bag of responses. Unemployment benefits help. As do various aid programs, such as food stamps and utility assistance plans. The more "socialist", the more such programs are likely to exist. The more capitalist, the more such problems as unemployment are unlikely to exist, with charities taking up the slack.
truee
Not at all; Mexico qualifies as a capitalist country; more so than many countries with a socialist government (i.e. France).
80%
Of course it is. Do a simple statistical analysis of the instances of normative 'crimes', such as burglary, theft and assault in nations with strong centralized, regulated markets and nations with laissez-faire libertarianist market policies and the conclusion should be quickly apparentAnswerNot necessarily. Capitalist countries just have better systems for compiling and reporting statistics. The statistics reported by capitalist countries are more reliable because they're normally reported by both government and independent agencies. For example, totalitarian governments tend to report statistics based on politics rather than facts; countries with ongoing unrest or war may not report crime at all when murder, robbery, or rape are a way of life and may go unchecked or may be government sanctioned. Another element that can affect reporting crime from country to country, is what is considered a crime in one country, may not be in another. Capitalist countries tend to have much higher standards for passing laws and punishments for acts against citizens. Capitalist countries also use more resources and technologies for detecting crime, apprehending criminals, and prosecuting crime.Monaco and Dubai are examples of very capitalist countries (don't bother to come if you don't plan to spend a lot of money), yet have very low crime rates.
Wealth in Europe is more concentrated, as wealth in all capitalistic countries are (European countries are mainly capitalist).
A country can have a mix of capitalist and socialist principles in its economic system, although it may lean more towards one or the other. For example, a country could have a capitalist economy with socialist welfare programs aimed at addressing social issues like healthcare and education.
People who say that kind of thing wouldn't recognize socialism if they found it swimming in their soup. More to the point, there are degrees of various political stances. There are no pure (or even mostly) Socialist countries in the world, any more than there are no pure (or mostly) Capitalist countries. In addition, Socialism isn't the opposite of Capitalism. So a move towards Socialism doesn't necessarily mean less Capitalism. In other regards, Yes, the Democratic Party tends to espouse and push for more Socialist ideas than does the Republican Party. However, both parties support various programs that can easily be labeled as "Socialist". Labeling major political parties and even most people as "Socialist", "Capitalist", "Communist", etc. is simplistic, and generally indicates a lack of intellectual depth or a political motive separate from actual truth-seeking.
Lenin called it the "New Economic Policy." It was more of a modification of the socialist system, which Lenin had imposed on the country than a modification of the former capitalist system.
Bismarck introduced anti socialist laws in 1878, which deprived socialist organizations of the right of assembly and publication.