It is impossible to convert a measurement of time into a measurement of length.
You can walk 1 km in 6 minutes if you can walk a mile in 10 minutes.
60/13 = 4.6
(800 meters/1.59 minutes) x ( 1 km/1,000 meters) x (60 minutes/hour) = 30.189 km/hr (rounded)
1 minute =60 sec so, 1 km min =60 km sec
You cover 100 km in one hour. 10 km is 1/10 of 100 km, so you need 1/10 of an hour = 6 minutes.
If you travel 1 km in 1 minute, your speed is 60 km/h. This is because there are 60 minutes in an hour, so covering 1 km in 1 minute translates to 60 km in 60 minutes, which is 60 km/h.
60 km an hour is 1 km a minute. Therefore it takes 100 minutes or 1 hour 40 minutes to travel 100 km
80 km in 60 minutes 1 km in 60/80 minutes = 3/4 minutes 14 km in (3/4)x14 = 21/2 = 10 and 1/2 minutes
4.5 km in 35 minutes equates to a pace of about 4.79 mph.
60. Rationale: The question shows "100 km per hour" This is equal to 100 km/hr. Since 1 hr = 60 minutes, you can substitute "60 minutes" into 100 km/hr to form a new equivalent rate, such as: 100 km/60 minutes Therefore, the answer is 60 (minutes). Answer 1: 100 km per hour is 100 km per 60 minutes. 100 km per hour is a velocity, with units of distance divided by time, so there is no way you can find a time equal to that. You need a distance as well. For example choose a distance of 10km. Then at 100km/hour, 10km/time = 100 km/hour from which you get time=0.1 hours to travel that 10km.
1 mile = 1.609344 km8.3 miles = 13.35756 km(12.0 km) x (1 mile/1.609344 km) x (1 hour/8.3 miles) x (60 minutes/hour) = 53minutes 54.1seconds (rounded)With a short break, I'd plan on an even 54 minutes.
To determine how many minutes it takes to cover 36 km, you need to know the speed at which you're traveling. For example, if you are running at a speed of 6 km/h, it would take 6 hours to cover 36 km, which is 360 minutes. If you're cycling at 20 km/h, it would take 1.8 hours, or 108 minutes. The time in minutes will vary based on your speed.