Wiki User
∙ 10y agoTrue.
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoAccording to the majority of the Muslims, it is justified. The Shias don't think so.
violence
Well, depends on how you look it at. But from the majority stand point, yes.
A majority (12).
accepting majority rule while insisting on minority rights
Were you fraudulently accepting payments knowing they exceeded the legal limits? Remember, ignorance of the law is not considered a defense.
valuing the need to compromise - Apex
the vice president and a majority of the cabinet. Whoever posted the last answer, made me get it wrong!
This was a sociological study about how much the majority rules the opinions of a group and how it affects the ones who disagree with the majority viewpoint. One variable might be: "Which aspect of the influence of a majority is more important - the size of the majority or its unanimity?" (/www.panarchy.org)
Because the majority of people who ask the questions are stupid people. Isn't it sad? I can't necessarily argue with the above comment - however, what amazes me most is not the poor grammar, it is the lack of context and content.
Some may argue that in cases where laws are viewed as deeply immoral, it can be justified to openly violate them to uphold higher moral principles. The decision to do so often stems from a belief in fundamental human rights and justice, even if it means going against the majority viewpoint. This can spark debates on the extent to which majority rule should dictate moral behavior.
IRS form 3800 is used to claim any of the general business credits. The IRS began accepting tax returns for the vast majority of taxpayers on January 30.