i think it might be the owner of the vehicle, legally, because you weren't in the vehicle at the time of the accident, but i would ask a lawyer to be sure
If car is wrecked or damaged BEFORE the repossion takes place they still take the car "AS IS". In some states you may be liable for the damages but others it is repo'd AS IS.
If it was your fault then your freind is liable for the damages. If it was the other guys fault then his insurance will pay for it. Keep in mind, while legally it is the owners responsibility for the damages, he can sue you if he wanted to.
no it is not reliable
The Thief is liable for the damages he causes. No one else. Take Care Insurance Plus
Both the Driver and the Owner are liable for the damages. The driver, whether licensed or not is the primarily liable party. The insured passenger owner is secondarily liable for damages by the unlicensed driver he permitted to operate his vehicle.
He is liable for the damages caused to the property.
If no drugs were found and you were aquitted completely, then they are liable for damages.
You are liable to pay for the damages on your property because of your lack of insurance.
Yes it is theft and they are liable for damages
The Estate would be responsible for any damages caused by the accident. The Estate would have to sue the driver who took the car to get back any monies paid.
Yes. If someone damages your property, they're liable.
Absolutely yes. You have no right to attach anything to your neighbor's property and will be held liable for any damages thereto.Absolutely yes. You have no right to attach anything to your neighbor's property and will be held liable for any damages thereto.Absolutely yes. You have no right to attach anything to your neighbor's property and will be held liable for any damages thereto.Absolutely yes. You have no right to attach anything to your neighbor's property and will be held liable for any damages thereto.