if the driver of the car that was hit has cut in front of you and put on his brakes giver you no chance to stop before u rear ended the other driver.
Stop screaming at my mother, it isnt her fault.
USUALLY THE PERSON IN THE REAR UNLESS THE FIRST DRIVER DID NOT SGINAL OR CUT THE OTHER DRIVER OFF
First of all it is the responsibility of all drivers to stop for the unexpected. "Ghost" drivers who cut people off which results in you hitting the guardrail are often times considered an "at fault" accident unless you have a witness to the accident that will confirm the "ghost" driver.
The driver who cut you off would be. However, if no witnesses remain to give an account of what happened, and the other driver denies it, it's going to come down to your word against theirs.
Since car 3 was the initial cause of the accident, car 3 is at fault. If car 3 had not cut off car 2, car 2 would not have hit car 1, and if that was the case there would not have been an accident. As I said, car 3 is at fault. Hope this helps.
Not enough information to determine whether the other driver was at fault for the collision or not. Did you run a red light or a stop sign? Drive inattentively? Cut them off in traffic? Etc? If the investigation shows that the other vehicle WAS at fault in the collision, they will probably be charged with the appropriate offense. As for you; you will be charged with whatever traffic offense you might have committed (if any), if it is YOU that is found at fault. In addition you will be charged for operating without a license and subject to whatever penalty your state prescribes for that paraticular offense.
There are isolation devices (Circuit breakers) meant to cut off or OPEN automatically when a fault occurs. The breaker has "opened" on fault.
Without actually witnessing the collision, it would be impossible for me to say who is really at fault. But if you wish to blame the other driver for cutting you off, go ahead; that is a legitimate argument.
A temporary fault in the supply
Rock layers cut by a fault formed as a result of tectonic forces. The faulting process involves rocks breaking and shifting along a fracture zone due to stress accumulation, leading to the development of a fault plane. Over time, this creates distinct layers on either side of the fault line due to the movement of the Earth's crust.
Just because you got the ticket doesn't mean you are at fault. When it goes to court, explain to the judge the circumstances and your actions. The other driver should have been at fault for following too closely, and your decision to tap the brakes was the correct one in my opinion. There are many circumstances that will influence this, like if you slammed on your brakes and did not tap them. However I got a ticket for failure to signal while braking and the driver behind me didn't get a ticket for failure to maintain safe driving distance