The authors claim is not supported by strong evidence
A strong synthesis claim is based on the thorough examination and analysis of multiple sources, identifying common themes, patterns, or connections among them. It requires drawing insightful conclusions and synthesizing diverse perspectives, providing a new understanding or perspective on the topic.
One potential strong counterclaim could be presenting evidence or eyewitness accounts that directly contradict the historian's claim. Additionally, analyzing alternative interpretations of the data provided by the historian could potentially weaken the strength of their claim. Alternatively, highlighting any biases or limitations in the historian's sources or methodology could also serve as a strong counterclaim.
B. thier familes and countries will be strong!
A good claim that states your opinion/fact, strong evidence that supports your claim, and reasoning that shows a link between the claim and evidence. The most important parts, in my opinion, are the reasoning and evidence, but the claim is important too. After all, the claim is the base. The evidence is the top, and the reasoning is all the details that make it interesting and worthy of of attention.
Yes because Spain used it to claim strong settlements in alta California
Well, what do you mean by 'buffs'? I don't believe that is a word, aside from "being buff", which is when you claim to be physically strong.
All of the amendments in the Bill of Rights are essential to democratic freedom, including the unpopular ones :)
yes There is strong evidence to suggest so. Andrew JENNINGS, a famous researcher on this topic supports this claim. There is a facebook group "FIFA Reformation" that also supports this claim. I certainly feel the political entity is corrupt.
One sentence that helps to give additional evidence of a claim or main idea is "Furthermore, studies have shown a strong correlation between regular exercise and improved mental health."
"His argument was strong, and furthermore, he provided evidence to support his claim."
Personal letters written by Julius Caesar indicate that he believed that Rome should always remain a republic.