To refute a claim with a counterclaim, you must support your argument with evidence to ensure the validity of your claims.
The argument from silence is when the absence of evidence is used to either support or refute a claim or theory. If there is no evidence to support a claim, it can be refuted using the argument from silence. Conversely, if there is a lack of evidence against a claim, it can be supported using the argument from silence.
Genetic fallacy
There is no evidence to confirm nor refute the claim that infants see spirits.
To confirm/refute your understanding
f i ask to you you is self asking to me that means you dono stupid
The plural of refute is refutes. As in "the company refutes the claims".
I have nothing to refute your hypothesis.
The lawyer had no argument to refute the evidence against his client. Refute means to disprove.
The opposite of refute is to prove correct.
I could refute his claim by using the interactionist approach in the ELL theory, which emphasizes that language acquisition is influenced by both internal cognitive processes and external social interactions. This approach suggests that language development is not solely determined by innate abilities or environmental factors, but rather by a combination of both. By highlighting the complexity of language acquisition and the multiple factors involved, I can argue against his claim that it is solely a result of one specific factor.
Refute