From a legal perspective, criminal liability is a subset of liability that implies the law was broken and harm may have been done to a person. Example: If a person owns a car and it has a defect that causes it to run into a person, the car owner is liable but not criminally liable (the maker of the car may be criminally liable, however, if they knew about the defect and did nothing to correct it). An easy rule of thumb is that criminal liability means State charges, while general liability could mean a civil case or even an informal resolution.
no, motive plays no part in criminal liability.
No.
civil liability
c) criminal liability
Gabriel Hallevy has written: 'The matrix of derivative criminal liability' -- subject(s): Criminal liability, Conspiracy, Accomplices
Martina Schwartz has written: 'Strafrechtliche Produkthaftung' -- subject(s): Criminal liability, Criminal provisions, Products liability
Strict liability makes a person responsible for the damage and loss caused by his/her acts and omissions regardless of culpability (or fault in criminal law terms, which would normally be expressed through a mens rea requirement; see Strict liability (criminal)). Strict liability is important in torts (especially product liability), corporations law, and criminal law. For analysis of the pros and cons of strict liability as applied to product liability, the most important strict liability regime,
Inchoate offenses and parties to a crime do not entail separate criminal offenses. Outline what these theories of criminal liability entail and what conduct is required in order to price such liability
yes if a death occurs
Da
Leonard Orland has written: 'Criminal procedure' -- subject(s): Criminal procedure 'Corporate criminal liability' -- subject(s): Corporations, Criminal liability of juristic persons, Corrupt practices 'Prisons' -- subject(s): Corrections, Prisons, Criminal law 'Connecticut criminal practice' -- subject(s): Criminal procedure
true