all insurance policys must conform to the statue of the state they are in...ie...Missouri is pure comparative neg.state, ks, is a 49/51% no fault, if i take my Missouri car/policy to ks, and get in an accident, then the Missouri policy must conform to the kansas law
The conflict of interest is at a no fault. The sentence should read "We had no fault for the car accident".
Generally no. You would have to prove the state built the road wrong or was at fault in some way for your accident.
check your state law,but if you dont have ins.you maybe found at fault. if you don't have insurance, its your fault ither way
Whether the car is insured is not important, the point is who was at fault in causing the accident, it could be the person whose car is insured that is at fault.
It depends what the other person in the car accident was doing.
In this state, the person who caused the accident is at fault. If the person at fault has insurance then his insurance should fix the other car. Otherwise, in this state, the person at fault owes the money himself to fix the other car. The insurance company will not pay one cent to fix the other car.
No. If the accident was your fault, you can not get money from the other person's car insurance.
Yes, the driver who was at fault is responsible for the bodily injury for anyone who has been hurt in the accident. The percentage of payment that has to be made would depend upon the percentage of fault for the accident, the prevaling norms of the state or province where the accident ocurred.
You either get the at fault party or their insurance to pay or you have a wrecked car.
It's never the dog's fault.
If there is no other vehicle involved in the accident, then the only person who can be at fault is the underage driver.