all insurance policys must conform to the statue of the state they are in...ie...Missouri is pure comparative neg.state, ks, is a 49/51% no fault, if i take my Missouri car/policy to ks, and get in an accident, then the Missouri policy must conform to the kansas law
The conflict of interest is at a no fault. The sentence should read "We had no fault for the car accident".
Generally no. You would have to prove the state built the road wrong or was at fault in some way for your accident.
The at-fault driver in a car accident is the driver who is determined to be primarily responsible for causing the accident.
If a driver in Missouri is involved in a car accident without insurance and is not at fault, they may still face legal consequences. Missouri law requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. If an uninsured driver is not at fault in an accident, they may still be held financially responsible for damages. Additionally, they may face fines, license suspension, and other penalties for driving without insurance. It is important for all drivers to carry proper insurance coverage to protect themselves in case of an accident.
check your state law,but if you dont have ins.you maybe found at fault. if you don't have insurance, its your fault ither way
Whether the car is insured is not important, the point is who was at fault in causing the accident, it could be the person whose car is insured that is at fault.
It depends what the other person in the car accident was doing.
No. If the accident was your fault, you can not get money from the other person's car insurance.
In this state, the person who caused the accident is at fault. If the person at fault has insurance then his insurance should fix the other car. Otherwise, in this state, the person at fault owes the money himself to fix the other car. The insurance company will not pay one cent to fix the other car.
You either get the at fault party or their insurance to pay or you have a wrecked car.
It's never the dog's fault.