In a collision, the second collision is when an unsecured driver strikes the inside of the vehicle.
True. In the context of a collision, the second collision refers to the impact that occurs when an unsecured driver or passenger strikes the interior of the vehicle after the initial impact. This can result in additional injuries, as the body moves forward due to inertia and can hit parts of the vehicle such as the steering wheel, dashboard, or windshield.
Almost without exception (actually I can't think of any) if a moving vehicle strikes a stopped vehicle from the rear, the operator of the moving vehicle is held responsible. ** The driver of B. That's why and what they were cited for. A strong hint is in the question - the one who strikes another is almost always wrong.
the driver pulling out from the curb.
Personally, I think that it should be the fault of the driver going across the aisle, but other may think otherwise.
When a driver applies the brakes, the vehicle experiences deceleration due to the friction between the brake pads and the brake rotors. This rapid slowing down shifts the weight of the vehicle forward, causing any unsecured objects or passengers to slide in the same direction. Additionally, the inertia of these objects causes them to continue moving forward until they are stopped by a seatbelt or other restraint.
The driver is responsible for the vehicle.
Why not. That unlicensed vehicle owner could be disabled and hired a licensed driver to drive the vehicle.
driver of parked vehicle
That rather depends on the vehicle. He or she could be a chauffer (private vehicle), taxi-driver, bus-driver, train-driver.
driver mechanics badge-driver wheeled vehicle
As far as states go I know in Utah it is the vehicle not the driver that is insured.
If the other vehicle was parked, there was no other driver to have license, insurance or registration. The driver who hit the parked vehicle is at fault and is liable for all damages to the parked vehicle.