You can not downgrade your Note 4 to the old lock screen. The old software will not work correctly with the newer firmware in the Note 4.
One can protect their valuable technologies with a Biometric fingerprint reader. No one else but the original user can access technologies protected by the fingerprint reader.
No. A cut (or even several) on the finger does not change the whorls and ridges of a fingerprint enough to disguise a print.
the original fingerprint would be maintained.
Fingerprints can be chemically removed permanently because the chemicals used can break down the ridges and patterns on the skin, making it difficult to recreate the original fingerprint.
Your finger prints are always going to stay the same. Since finger prints are very easily recognized as the main identity verification it is essential that they don't change.The science of fingerprint identification has served all governments wordwide during the past 1oo years to provide acurate identification of criminals.No two fingerprint have ever been found identical in many billions of humans and automated computer comparisons.
Identical twins are formed by the human egg splitting after being fertilized. The DNA also splits, and each new egg contains the DNA of the original. This means that the twins, once born, have identical DNA. It's worth nothing that they won't have the same physical fingerprint.
The value you get from a MD5 function is the fingerprint of a block of data (any type of file, even programs can be considered data), it allows you to confirm that your copy of the data is the same as the original (no corruption), because slight changes to the input of the MD5 algorithm will produce a different string.
Forging a biometric sample involves creating a replica of a biometric trait (such as a fingerprint or facial image) to bypass authentication systems. This process typically requires advanced technical knowledge, specialized equipment, and access to the original biometric data for replication. It is also illegal and unethical as it involves identity theft and can have serious legal consequences.
Depends on the depth of the cut. After years of occasional woodworking, I have a couple of fingers where a smooth line of scar tissue runs right across the arches and ridges of the original fingerprint. If you're thinking "crime", it doesn't really matter much either way, since the scars become a part of the pattern. And for the amount of injury a person is likely to pick up through everyday life there's still plenty of the original pattern left to work with for identification purposes. Even people with deep burns, or flaying type injuries to their fingertips do tend to display fingerprints. Only thing is that they get a personal set of smudges and blotches instead of the classical ridges and arches. It can make automatic recognition more difficult, but doesn't ultimately prevent identification.
The Iphone 5s has lots of new features that have not been included in any other design such as a fingerprint scanner, enhanced camera and a faster A7 chip. The Iphone 5c is simply the more budget Iphone. It comes in a variety of colours and has more of the features that the original iPhone 5 had. The 5c doesn't have Apple's new features that are in the 5s. :) iPhone 5S is better. it More powerful than iPhone 5C. less people like iPhone 5C
Torpedo, necktie, pens, flashlights, blimps (zeppelins), alternating current generator, light bulb (no, it wasnt made by edison, he just altered it from the original design), modern forensics (fingerprint usage) and many other things. It also spawned many famous people, such as Goran Visnjic, Rade Serbedzija, Eric Bana is also of croatian descent, and rumors say Nicolas Cage also originates from Croatia. Croatia is a very noble and proud country.
Digital imaging is allows for block to block copying of a suspect storage device. Imaging differs from drag & drop copying, in that it makes an identical copy of the drive (to include slack space) instead of just copying the files themselves. A write blocker may be required in some cases to prevent unintentional writing by the OS. Once the original has been imaged at least twice, either an MD5 or SHA1 hash (digital fingerprint) is made to compare it against the images. If they match, then it is trivial for a forensic analyst to prove to the client that the evidence has been unaltered, and anything acquired is identical to what the suspect had on his original drive.