No. Distance is dependent on both length of travel and speed of travel.
For example,
If car A leaves location X at a certain time, and travels at 200km/hr for two hours, it travels 400km.
If car B leaves the same location at the same time, and travels 50km/hr for four hours, it travels 200km.
As you can see, car A traveled for half the time car B traveled while doubling its total distance traveled.
Not necessarily. The distance a car travels is determined by its speed and the time it spends traveling. If a car is traveling at a slower speed but for a longer period of time, it may not cover as much distance as a car traveling at a faster speed but for a shorter period of time. So, the longest time does not always correspond to the greatest distance traveled.
No. In general, for the simplified case of constant speed, use the formula: distance = speed x time
Not necessarily. The speed at which the car is traveling also plays a significant role in determining the distance covered. A car traveling at a slower speed can travel for a longer time and cover less distance than a car traveling at a higher speed for a shorter amount of time.
Yes, traveling at a higher speed increases the kinetic energy of the vehicle, which means it will require a greater stopping distance to come to a complete stop. This is because the vehicle needs more time and distance to reduce its speed gradually.
You multiply the speed at which you are traveling by the time spent traveling.
speed and time
If you travel less distance in the same time, you are traveling slower.
For traveling a certain distance in the least given time.
traveling greater distances.
That would be Speed. Speed is the distance you are going divided by the time it takes. This will calculate the average speed you were traveling.
the Orient Express
i beleive the longest journey was from germany to australia, complete a long time ago