Yes. Catalytic converters and other emissions control devices would clean things up, but they're often too big, too heavy or too hot to install on motorcycles. Motorbikes, they emit less carbon dioxide, but they emit large amounts of nitrogen oxides, so turns out the average motorcycle is 10 times more polluting per mile than a passenger car, light truck or SUV. It seems counter-intuitive, because motorcycles are about twice as fuel-efficient as cars and emit a lot less C02
For the most part, no. Motorcycles tend to be faster than cars.
Yes they are! thay are so much safer than scooters or motorbikes! because there is a roof to protect you and airbags
Because cars are safer than motorcycles. Yet although motorbikes can occaisnally be cheaper people choose the safer option (most of the time!)
They are not they are actually worse
Alot - more miles to the liter. Parts are cheaper generally speaking, and they are a hell of a lot more fun!!
Yes they arent good cars at all as a matter of fact they are way worse than our cars.
all motorbikes are different so i guess some motorbikes could be quieter?
No worse than any other manufacture's vehicles.
Most likely in the distant future worse than it is now. But later than that I'm not sure
Trains are better for the environment - as they produce less pollution per passenger than cars do.
Yes there are they are of a stronger metal than a push bike.
The rich consume; the poor do not (consume so much).