All s is p ---->Let this be premise 1 conversion of this premise is: Some p is s. derivation of this premise is: some s is p. All p is k ------>Let this be premise 2 conversion of this premise is: Some k is p. derivation of this premise is: some p is k. Conclusion of premise 1 and premise 2: All s is p All p is k Conclusion: All s is k 5 examples: i) some k is o some o is t valid conclusions: I) some k is t II) some t is k III)some o is k IV)some t is o ii) No s is p No p is k Valid conclusions: I) No p is s II)No k is p III)some s is not p IV)some p is not k V)some p is not s VI)some k is not p iii)All s is p All p is k Valid conclusions: I)All s is k II)some s is p III)some p is k IV)some s is k V)some p is s VI)some k is p VII)some k is s vi)some s is not p some p is not k Valid conclusions: I) No valid conclusion vi)All s is p some p is k valid conclusions: I)some s is k II)some s is p III)some k is p VI)some k is s V)some p is s
all of them c-r-i-s-p k-ra-i-s-p
An OAE-1 is a specific categorical syllogism. More accurately, it is representative of the Mood and Figure of the categorical syllogism. The OAE represents the Mood, which in this case is "Some M are not P, All S are M, and therefore All S are not P." The "-1" represents the Figure, which is determined by the location of the Middle term (represented by M). As you can see, this categorical syllogism is Invalid, because the conclusion that All S are not P is not necessarily true, even if both of the Premises (Some M are not P and All S are M) are true. Tl;Dr It's an Invalid Categorical Syllogism. Some M are not P All S are M ________________ All S are not P
#include<stdio.h> main() { char str1[80],str2[80]; char *s,*p; printf("\nEnter the string"); gets(str1); s=str1; p=str2; while(*s) { if(*s=='a'*s=='e'*s=='i'*s=='o'*s=='u') s++; else *p++=*s++; } *p='\0'; printf("\nSenetnce after removing all the vowels is:\n"); puts(str2); }
P= S + S + S + S P= # + # + # + # P= answer
seismic waves
here is its s s s * - S P ( - P O [%P] P O s Y i 4 - s s s s s s s * S P ( - P O [%P] P P s O [4o] i - * * * * ( ( ( ( % % % % 4 4 4 4 - s s s s * - S P ( - P O [%P] P O P P s O [4o] i - s s s s s * - S P ( - O O s P O O s P O O g g g g g * - s D ( - D D [%D] D D S - [4s] s s s s s s s s* - S P ( - O O s P O O s P O O - O g g g D g D ( - P s S - [%D] D D s D s 4 - i o O - g g g D g D ( - P s S S D s D D s D s 4 i o O - g g g D g h ( H h - D D D D S S s - s s s s * - S P ( - O P O o o s o O 4Share this:
M-I-S-S-I-S-S-I-P-P-I was created in 1916.
No, elements in the s and p blocks of the periodic table are not called transition metals. Transition metals are a group of elements located in the d-block of the periodic table. Elements in the s and p blocks have different properties compared to transition metals.
lappets
P-block elements can be metals, metalloids, or nonmetals whiles S-block elements are all metals. P-block elements can be either gases or solids while S-block are all solids. and each P-block elements displays a greater range of properties.
c s c l s d P n