The statement "All S are P" is called a universal affirmative claim. It asserts that every member of the subject class (S) is included in the predicate class (P). This type of claim is often used in logic and syllogisms to establish relationships between categories.
All s is p ---->Let this be premise 1 conversion of this premise is: Some p is s. derivation of this premise is: some s is p. All p is k ------>Let this be premise 2 conversion of this premise is: Some k is p. derivation of this premise is: some p is k. Conclusion of premise 1 and premise 2: All s is p All p is k Conclusion: All s is k 5 examples: i) some k is o some o is t valid conclusions: I) some k is t II) some t is k III)some o is k IV)some t is o ii) No s is p No p is k Valid conclusions: I) No p is s II)No k is p III)some s is not p IV)some p is not k V)some p is not s VI)some k is not p iii)All s is p All p is k Valid conclusions: I)All s is k II)some s is p III)some p is k IV)some s is k V)some p is s VI)some k is p VII)some k is s vi)some s is not p some p is not k Valid conclusions: I) No valid conclusion vi)All s is p some p is k valid conclusions: I)some s is k II)some s is p III)some k is p VI)some k is s V)some p is s
all of them c-r-i-s-p k-ra-i-s-p
An OAE-1 is a specific categorical syllogism. More accurately, it is representative of the Mood and Figure of the categorical syllogism. The OAE represents the Mood, which in this case is "Some M are not P, All S are M, and therefore All S are not P." The "-1" represents the Figure, which is determined by the location of the Middle term (represented by M). As you can see, this categorical syllogism is Invalid, because the conclusion that All S are not P is not necessarily true, even if both of the Premises (Some M are not P and All S are M) are true. Tl;Dr It's an Invalid Categorical Syllogism. Some M are not P All S are M ________________ All S are not P
#include<stdio.h> main() { char str1[80],str2[80]; char *s,*p; printf("\nEnter the string"); gets(str1); s=str1; p=str2; while(*s) { if(*s=='a'*s=='e'*s=='i'*s=='o'*s=='u') s++; else *p++=*s++; } *p='\0'; printf("\nSenetnce after removing all the vowels is:\n"); puts(str2); }
seismic waves
P= S + S + S + S P= # + # + # + # P= answer
here is its s s s * - S P ( - P O [%P] P O s Y i 4 - s s s s s s s * S P ( - P O [%P] P P s O [4o] i - * * * * ( ( ( ( % % % % 4 4 4 4 - s s s s * - S P ( - P O [%P] P O P P s O [4o] i - s s s s s * - S P ( - O O s P O O s P O O g g g g g * - s D ( - D D [%D] D D S - [4s] s s s s s s s s* - S P ( - O O s P O O s P O O - O g g g D g D ( - P s S - [%D] D D s D s 4 - i o O - g g g D g D ( - P s S S D s D D s D s 4 i o O - g g g D g h ( H h - D D D D S S s - s s s s * - S P ( - O P O o o s o O 4Share this:
M-I-S-S-I-S-S-I-P-P-I was created in 1916.
No, elements in the s and p blocks of the periodic table are not called transition metals. Transition metals are a group of elements located in the d-block of the periodic table. Elements in the s and p blocks have different properties compared to transition metals.
c s c l s d P n
lappets
Its called: I dont know :P This has been a great waste of time