answersLogoWhite

0

An ad hominem logical fallacy is an insult of a person making a point. If someone was making a point, and a person in opposition to that point called them a name as opposed to responding to their evidence, that would be an ad hominem.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

The passage from “the damnation of a canyon” is an example of which logical fallacy?

Ad hominem


What is Ad hominem?

An ad hominem fallacy, sometimes called a "genetic fallacy" or "to the person fallacy" or shorted to "ad hominem", is a kind of logical fallacy. This logical fallacy's definition is: attacking the person rather than the statements the person made.


What is an example of the logical fallacy called attach ad hominem?

An example of the ad hominem fallacy is when someone attacks their opponent's character or traits rather than addressing the argument itself. For instance, saying someone's argument is wrong because they are unintelligent is an ad hominem attack.


What is an ad hominem?

An ad hominem fallacy, sometimes called a "genetic fallacy" or "to the person fallacy" or shorted to "ad hominem", is a kind of logical fallacy. This logical fallacy's definition is: attacking the person rather than the statements the person made.


What type of logical fallacy does this passage from The Damnation of a Canyon contain?

Ad hominem


Congressman Smith opposes military action because he is weak and cowardly. Which logical fallacy does this example contain?

Ad hominem


Eliza Benedict wants to abolish the death penalty because she is a bleeding-heart liberal. Which logical fallacy does this example contain?

Ad hominem


What type of logical fallacy is this statement an example of?

Without knowing the specific statement, it is difficult to identify the type of logical fallacy. Can you please provide the statement so I can assist you further?


What is an ad hominem fallacy?

An ad hominem fallacy is when an argument attacks a person's character or traits instead of addressing the actual issue being discussed. It is considered a logical fallacy because attacking the person making an argument does not invalidate the argument itself.


Which logical fallacy appears in this passage?

I'm happy to help identify a logical fallacy if you provide the passage for me to review.


Attacking the person instead of the argument is a type logical fallacy called?

ad hominem


Introducing irrelevant facts or arguments to distract from the subject under discussion is a type of logical fallacy?

ad hominem