0
An example of an ad hominem logical fallacy would be when someone attacks the character or traits of a person making an argument rather than addressing the actual argument itself. For instance, if participants in a debate call each other names or criticize personal attributes instead of focusing on the topic at hand, they are committing an ad hominem fallacy.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The passage from “the damnation of a canyon” is an example of which logical fallacy?
Ad hominem
What is Ad hominem?
An ad hominem fallacy, sometimes called a "genetic fallacy" or "to the person fallacy" or shorted to "ad hominem", is a kind of logical fallacy. This logical fallacy's definition is: attacking the person rather than the statements the person made.
What is an example of the logical fallacy called attach ad hominem?
An example of the ad hominem fallacy is when someone attacks their opponent's character or traits rather than addressing the argument itself. For instance, saying someone's argument is wrong because they are unintelligent is an ad hominem attack.
What is an ad hominem?
An ad hominem is a type of fallacy where an argument is directed against a person's character rather than the content of their argument. It involves attacking the individual making the argument rather than addressing the points they are trying to make.
What type of logical fallacy does this passage from The Damnation of a Canyon contain?
Ad hominem
Congressman Smith opposes military action because he is weak and cowardly. Which logical fallacy does this example contain?
Ad hominem
Eliza Benedict wants to abolish the death penalty because she is a bleeding-heart liberal. Which logical fallacy does this example contain?
Ad hominem
What type of logical fallacy is this statement an example of?
Without knowing the specific statement, it is difficult to identify the type of logical fallacy. Can you please provide the statement so I can assist you further?
What is an ad hominem fallacy?
An ad hominem fallacy is when an argument attacks a person's character or traits instead of addressing the actual issue being discussed. It is considered a logical fallacy because attacking the person making an argument does not invalidate the argument itself.
Which logical fallacy appears in this passage?
I'm happy to help identify a logical fallacy if you provide the passage for me to review.
Introducing irrelevant facts or arguments to distract from the subject under discussion is a type of logical fallacy?
ad hominem
What logical fallacy redirects the audience's focus from the actual argument to the character of the person supporting it?
An "ad hominem" argument.
