Any form of electrical lighting will produce both light and heat, and with inefficient, incandescent lighting you get a higher proportion of heat rather than light, as compared to other forms of lighting such as fluorescent, or the most efficient, which is LED, which turns almost all of the electric power that it consumes into light, and very little into heat.
Incandescent bulbs generate light through resistive heating of a tungsten filament, to such a point that the filament glows and provides light. This resistive heating produces large amounts of waste heat and a relatively small amount of power translated into light. In an LED, there is relatively little waste heat, as photons (packets of light) are directly generated. Although it is much more efficient of a light emitter than an incandescent light, there is some small amount of heat generated.
A Low energy bulbs uses about 1/5 energy of a traditional bulb. ie. 20w (Low energy bulb) = 100w (standard filiment bulb) 80%+ traditional bulb s' energy is lost as heat. The 20% figure shown above only relates to the low energy bulb during its normal usage. The question was about the overall ecological balance, which includes ecological burden through manufacture, distribution and disposal (or recycling). Low energy light bulbs contain heavy metals, electronics and toxic materials, and are manufactured (and recycled) using much more complicated and, presumably, more ecologically damaging processes compared to those involved in traditional tungsten filaments. The question is still open thus.
Yes, if we look at the electrical energy used, illumination obtained and lifespan of LED lighting. LED light uses electrical energy 80% more efficient than Incandescent lighting, and 50% more efficient than fluorescent lamp. Led light uses electrical energy 80% more efficient than Incandescent lighting, and 50% more efficient than fluorescent lamp. Incandescent lifespan of about 2000 hours, 3500 hours halogen, fluorescent approximately 8000 hours, while the LED illumination can be expected to live up to 50000 hours and continue.
Old-style fluorescent tube bulbs and the newer CFBs (compact fluorescent bulb) are considered more efficient for a number of reasons. First, they consume roughly 1/5 the energy of incandescent (ie, tungsten filament) bulbs for a comparable light output. A quick survey of the package labels tells that an average CFB is rated for 15 watts of electrical consumption, versus 60 to 75 for the average incandescent bulb. So, there is a savings in electricity, whether you choose to quantify that savings as monetary or environmental. Second, in addition to the decreased operational cost, fluorescent lights have a lifespan many times that of incandescent bulbs, which must be replaced more frequently. This translates to myriad efficiency gains; there is a financial incentive for their use, since over the long haul, they are less expensive to purchase and replace than incandescent bulbs. There is an even greater incentive for industrial and commercial consumers, since this reduced frequency in replacement translates directly into decreased maintenance and manpower costs. Take your average Wal-Mart or warehouse store -- if those thousands of bulbs were incandescent lighting, the store would have to maintain a small staff dedicated to the continuous replacement of its bulbs. Third, in addition to this obvious time and energy savings, there are more subtle efficiencies that can be found; fluorescent bulbs generate far less heat in operation than comparable incandescent bulbs -- in fact, many run completely cool to the touch. Compare this with the average incandescent bulb; although advances such as 'cool white' bulbs have decreased the heat of the incandescent bulb, all will burn a user instantly, as they generate a significant amount of heat. Since the bulk of the average electric bill (residential or commercial) is spent on air conditioning, this unwanted additional heat source is to be avoided, since it results in incrementally higher cooling bills. Even if the added heat is desirable (for example, in winter), this would still be a very inefficient means of heating. Fourth, any source of heat can be a cause of a fire. Reducing and eliminating unnecessary heat sources is good safety sense. Countless home fires have been caused by table lamps falling over, or random clothing items draped over lampshades. It's hard to question the inefficiency of everything one owns going up in smoke. Despite the many advantages of fluorescent lighting, many environmentalists have concerns about the toxic content of fluorescent bulbs, which contain Mercury. These bulbs should not be placed in ordinary residential waste collection, but should rather be recycled through a local hazardous materials collection program, which all American communities should have. On the point of Mercury toxicity, it can however be argued that the increased electrical demand of an incandescent bulb causes more Mercury to be released at the point of electrical production; trace amounts contained in coal burned to produce the electricity accumulate into more than is contained in the fluorescent bulb. Thus, simply because an incandescent bulb contains no Mercury, it isn't completely blameless. Its increased electrical consumption likely releases comparable quantities of Mercury as CFBs.
AnswerIncandescent bulbs contain lead. Contact your local garbage or recycling facility to ask about their disposal methods, whether or not they will pick them up for your house or if you have to drop them off. Store them in the packaging you received them in until proper disposal.
no
Incandescente light bulbs waste quite a bit more energy than most alternatives.
Incandescent light bulbs waste a lot of energy by producing heat along with light, whereas energy-saving bulbs, such as LEDs or CFLs, are more efficient at converting electricity into light. Therefore, incandescent bulbs require more electrical energy to produce the same amount of light as energy-saving bulbs.
Compact fluorescent light bulbs are more efficient than incandescent light bulbs because they produce light by converting more electrical energy into visible light and less into heat. Incandescent light bulbs waste a lot of energy as heat, while compact fluorescent bulbs produce more light with less heat generation, resulting in higher efficiency and lower energy consumption.
The type of light bulbs that waste the most energy are incandescent bulbs. They are least efficient because around 90% of the energy is lost on heat. They are also the shortest-lived light bulbs. The most efficient lights are LED lights, followed by CFLs, followed by the new Halogen incandescent bulbs. See the related link below for more information.
Incandescent light bulbs are less efficient than fluorescent bulbs because they produce light by heating a filament, which generates a lot of heat energy in addition to light. This results in a waste of energy compared to fluorescent bulbs, which produce light by exciting mercury vapor to create UV light that then stimulates a phosphor coating to emit visible light.
Because they give off much of their energy as heat due to how the metal filament works
Incandescent and halogen light bulbs use more energy than compact fluorescent lights and LED lights. Fluorescent lamps with magnetic ballasts use more energy than fluorescent lamps with electronic ballasts.
In a LED, electrical energy is converted directly into light energy, resulting in a decrease in electrical energy and an increase in light energy. This process is much more efficient than traditional incandescent bulbs, which waste energy as heat.
CFLs (compact fluorescent lamps) are more efficient than traditional incandescent bulbs because they produce light by exciting mercury vapor and converting the UV light into visible light. This process requires less energy compared to incandescent bulbs, which emit light by heating a filament until it glows. Additionally, CFLs produce less heat, which reduces energy waste and makes them more environmentally friendly.
Light bulbs can be bad for the earth because many traditional incandescent light bulbs are not energy-efficient, leading to higher electricity consumption and increased carbon emissions. Additionally, if improperly disposed of, light bulbs containing mercury can contaminate soil and water sources.
A CFL light bulb can save about 75% of energy compared to an incandescent bulb. This is because CFLs are more efficient in converting electricity into light, while incandescent bulbs produce more heat than light, resulting in greater energy waste.