Literal art would involve at least some form that is recognisable e.g. a bird. Non objective work is unrecognisable as anything other than itself e.g. a black square. The problem of course is that a black square may look like other black squares or as you may have imagined a black square to look or indeed the night sky. Hence is there really such a condition as non-objective for socialised humans?
Chat with our AI personalities
The content of nonobjective art is its form.
Non-objects.
Non-objective works are completely abstract and do not represent anything literal.
A truly abstract work of art is derived from an actual object or things in the real world, something found in nature that the artist has 'abstracted'. A non objective work of art has no ties to any real world objects or things and so it is not an abstraction of anything, it is aptly named, non objective.
difference between hand drawings and digital art