If you are referring to total gun control, here are some points of views.
Pro: -You can have young teenagers/madmen/adults killing people without thinking through, and let their anger control them.
-Police have to obtain the best guns money can buy to outgun criminals
-Risk of domestic accidents from misfires
Cons:
-As guns are only instruments of killing, it is not the sole instrument. Without guns, people will still find a way to produce guns and ammunition, or use a more painful approach to killing, like knives.
-Without guns, neighborhood lacks the deterrent to make criminals think twice before commitment
-If gun control were to set in, only two groups of people are armed, the government and the criminals/terrorists. The civilians are free to be held at gunpoint.
Guns don't solve all our problems, neither does violence, but the threat of violence again violence is enough to weed out potential threats, at the cost of civilian and the lives of law enforcement.
Chat with our AI personalities
The Democratic Party is not against the Second Amendment, it is merely for gun control. The idea of gun control is that you shouldn't be allowed to own an AK, because the only reason to own an AK is to kill other people. Republicans usually charge that because Democrats are pro-gun control, that they are anti-second amendment, but those are two different things.
Nominally, Republican party does not support gun control legislation, except measures which restrict criminal use of firearms. However, in reality it varies with the individual and the circumstances. Some notable Republican figures have supported gun control measures when it was politically convenient. For instance, President Reagan signed the 1986 FOPA into law, which had the effect of closing the machine gun registry.
Yes, the sway bar linkage connects to the control arms on both sides, usually on the lower control arm.
isosceles ( having two equal sides)
strict gun control laws, more money allocated for welfare programs, and more lenient laws on immigration