When Pangaea was in existence, the main animals were reptiles and amphibians. During this time, birds developed also.
because it is one of the facts that prove the theries of continental drift and Pangaea
Go to google and search Pangaea
It shows that Pangaea was a long continent that crossed the equator. Asia & North America then split from the other continent. Antarctica split off the rest.
he was GREAT artist
all continents were one
Pangaea's main feature was a super-continent made up of all the land in the world (except China).
When Pangaea was in existence, the main animals were reptiles and amphibians. During this time, birds developed also.
because it is one of the facts that prove the theries of continental drift and Pangaea
It's main export is pizza ingredients.
Scientists hypothesize that there are two main stages to the formation of Pangaea: the assembly stage, during which the continents were moving closer together, and the breakup stage, when Pangaea began to split into separate continents.
Pangaea was a supercontinent that existed around 335 million years ago, while Pangaea Ultima is a hypothetical future supercontinent predicted to form in around 250 million years. The main difference is that Pangaea was a past supercontinent that has already broken apart, while Pangaea Ultima is a potential future configuration of Earth's landmasses.
Pangaea was a supercontinent that existed about 335 to 175 million years ago, during the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras. The breakup of Pangaea led to the formation of the continents we have today and shaped the Earth's geological features.
No people were not around when Pangaea was. The time of Pangaea was before the time of the dinosaurs (they came in the Jurasic era) and we are supposed to have evoled from some types of dinosuars.
Pangaea split into two main pieces: Laurasia in the north and Gondwana in the south. Over time, these landmasses further fragmented into the continents we recognize today.
some did some didnt
The hypothesis of the supercontinent Pangaea was not rejected, but rather supported by geological evidence such as matching rock formations, fossils, and mountain ranges across different continents. The concept of plate tectonics provided a framework to explain the breakup of Pangaea into separate continents over time.